Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0804 Minutes for August 4, 2020 Adams County Board of Supervisors Board Minutes Courthouse,Adams County,Tuesday August 4,2020 A regular meeting of the Adams County Board of Supervisors was held with Chairman Lee Hogan presiding. Roll call members present, Michael Stromer- District 1,Glen Larsen—District 2, Lee Hogan- District 3,Scott Thomsen—District 4, Dale Curtis- District 5,Chuck Neumann—District 6, Eldon Orthmann—District 7. Motion by Orthmann,seconded by Stromer that this is an open public meeting of the Adams County Board of Supervisors. Roll Call;Ayes:Stromer, Larsen, Hogan,Thomsen,Curtis, Neumann, Orthmann. Nays: None Notice of this meeting was advertised in the Hastings Tribune.A continuously updated agenda has been available in the County Clerk's officer and available on the Adams County website. No modifications have been made to the agenda within the past twenty four hours. Agenda for Meeting of Adams County Board of Supervisors County Board Room,Courthouse,2nd Floor *Date of Meeting,August 4,2020, 9:30 A.M. Chairman to request a motion that this is an open public meeting of the Adams County Board of Supervisors Announce location of Agenda&Open Meetings Law postings Reminder to turn off all cell phones Pledge of Allegiance Conflicts of Interest Roll call: Approve minutes: Committee reports: Receive Comments from the Public: 9:45 a.m.Dawn Miller-Approve Chairman's signing on the construction Contracts with Theisen Construction for Proj C1-490 per bid award by Supervisors on June 16,2020 Discussion&possible approval for 1%Over-ride for the 2020-2021 budget Ron Kucera—present for possible approval;a renewal of the Interlocal agreement between Adams County and the City of Hastigns for GIS services 10:00—11:00 Dave Bergin—Value of damages and the value of real property taken for use related to the isolated access road withch was determined to be built by the County Board:action on amount of such damages and cost of real property taken for use to build such road Present for possible approval,an agreement with the Lancaster County Youth Services Center of juvenile detention services Possible Leasing of Property purchased from Butler Machinery Judy Mignery—Present for possible approval,Planning and Zoning Case#20-08.3 Ashley and Justen Subdivision concurrent with(Resolution 2020-08-04.02)the vacation of Coats Family Farm Ramona Thomas—Present for approval,Reslution 2020-08-04.03,authorizing petty cash amounts for various county offices. Dale Curtis—Present for possible approval;Resolution 2020-08-04.01 to amend accrued vacation time policy Chuck Neumann—present a request from the South Heartland District Health Department for funding assistance of immunization clinics Scott Thomsen—present for possible approval,a change order from Oak Creek Engineering for the ACOB parking lot resurfacing Miscellaneous Business Claims Miscellaneous Receipts Officer Reports This agenda is subject to amending until 9:30 AM on the Monday preceding the Board meeting. Note to Citizens:Any agenda item may be moved down at any time at the discretion of the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors. Last updated on August 3,2020 at 9:17 a.m. For non-English speaking attendees wishing to arrange for a sign language or foreign language interpreter,please call or fax the County Attorney's office at Phone:402-461-7240 or Fax:402 461-7241. For hearing-impaired individuals or individuals with other special needs call or fax the County Clerk's Office at Phone:402 461-7107,or TTY:402 461-7166 or Fax:402-461-7185. When requesting an interpreter or services for the hearing impaired,please provide at least forty-eight(48)hours advance notice to allow time for making the accommodations. The Board reserves the right to go into executive session if such session is clearly necessary for the protection of the public interest or for the prevention of needless injury to the reputation of an individual. Chairman Hogan inquired if there were any corrections to the minutes for the July 21,2020 meeting. Supervisors Larsen requested the motion to accept the letter submitted by West Blue Township to dissolve, be corrected to reflect Supervisor Larsen making the motion and Supervisor Stromer providing the second to the motion. Motion by Neumann, seconded by Stromer to approve the June 16, 2020 minutes with Supervisor Larsen's requested correction. Roll Call;Ayes:Stromer, Larsen, Hogan,Thomsen, Curtis, Neumann, Orthmann. Nays: None Supervisors attended the following committee meetings and community events since the last board meeting and provided a brief report: Thomsen: (no dates provided)Attended numerous justice center planning meetings (no date provided) Inspected the land pertaining to the isolated land hearings (no date provided)Attended numerous meetings regarding issues with the improvements to the ACOB parking lot July 22nd and 23rd -Attended the Board of Equalization property protest hearings August 4,2020—Attended an Adams County Building and Grounds meeting Stromer: (no date provided) Inspected the land pertaining to the isolated land hearings July 22nd and 23rd -Attended the Board of Equalization property protest hearings August 4,2020—Attended an Adams County Building and Grounds meeting August 3,2020—Attended an Adams County Planning and Zoning meeting Orthmann- August 4,2020—Attended an Adams County Building and Grounds meeting Neumann- July 22,2020-Attended the Board of Equalization property protest hearings Curtis- July 22"d and 23rd-Attended the Board of Equalization property protest hearings July 30,2020—Attended a SCEDD Board meeting in St. Paul, NE Larsen- July 22"d and 23rd-Attended the Board of Equalization property protest hearings July 29,2020—Attended a meeting at Adams Central High School with Nebraska Department of Transportation representative present; regarding the Highway 6 roundabout project Hogan- July 22nd and 23rd-Attended the Board of Equalization property protest hearings July 24,2020—was a panel member for the UNL Lead Program Attended numerous meetings with Dawn Miller at the roads department Chairman Hogan opened the meeting to hear comments from the public. No public comments were made. Adams County Highway Superintendent, Dawn Miller, presented the board with a contract with Theisen Construction for road project C1-490 as was awarded on June 16,2020. Miller has reviewed the contract and is requesting approval of the chairman's signature. Supervisor Neumann confirmed with Miller that this was for a joint project with Nuckolls County. Motion by Neumann, seconded by Larsen to approve the chairman signing the contract with Theisen Construction which was approved on June 16,2020 for the project with Nuckolls County. Roll Call;Ayes: Stromer, Larsen, Hogan,Thomsen,Curtis, Neumann,Orthmann. Nays: None CONTRACT This Contract is made and entered into in triplicate this day of , 2020, by and between Adams County, Nebraska, acting through its Board of County Supervisors (hereinafter"Owner"), and Theisen Construction, Inc., (hereinafter"Contractor"). The Contractor did submit a proposal for the construction of two concrete deck slab bridges in NuckollstAdams County and other incidental work, as set forth in the Contract Documents for the project titled "STWD-CBMP(4),C-65(616) &C1-490"and previously filed with the Nuckolls County Clerk. A copy of the Contractor's proposal is attached hereto and made a part of this Contract. The amount of the Contractor's proposal was$415,570.98 and such is the full amount of this Contract, with no additions or deletions,except by written change order as set forth in the Contract Documents. If any change orders are issued, they shall be at the unit prices set forth in the Contractor's proposal or as negotiated with the Owner, and will in no way be construed as a release or waiver from the obligations of this Contract. In consideration of the following mutual agreements between the parties to this Contract, the Contractor agrees to furnish all work in accordance with said Contract Documents. The Owner agrees to pay the Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents and the Contractor's proposal. This Owner awards this Contract to the Contractor subject to the following conditions: This Contract is for the Adams County C1-490 project only. The Nuckolls County project will be awarded via separate contract. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Contract on this day of , 20_. OWNER: CONTRACTOR: Board of County Supervisors Theisen Construction, Inc. Adams County By: By: Pat Gubbels Title: Title: President iv / Notary Public My commission expires the day of '' ` '�,20)3 f .; GENERAL NOTARY-State of Nebraska TAMARA L BUTTERFIELD —�_ MY Comm.Exp.August 2,2023 tSTWD-CBMP(4).C-65(616)&C1-490 NUCKOLLS COUNTY,NEBRASKA Board of County Commissioners Nuckolls County Courthouse Nelson,Nebraska 68961 Gentlemen: Theisen Construction, Inc. .,(contractor)after reviewing these Bid Documents and Specifications in full,propose to furnish all labor,transportation,materials and equipment and all other miscellaneous items required to construct the project as shown at the following unit prices: CONSTRUCTION OF TWO SPAN CONCRETE DECK SLAB BRIDGE.C-65016) ITEM PLAN ITEM UNIT NO. OUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNITS PRICE AMOUNT 1.1. 1.000 Mobilization Lump Sum $59,230.64 $59,230.64 1.2. 1.000 Site Preparation Lump Sum $13,350.00 $13,350.00 1-3. 1,611.000 Earthwork Measured in Embankment Cu.Yds. $10.50 $16,915.50 1-4. 44.000 24"Corrugated Metal $30.36 $1,335.84 Drive Pipe Lin Ft 1-5. 135.000 Crushed Rock Surface Course Tons 146.22 $6,239.70 1-6. 4.000 Guardrail End $Z}fiZ5 00 $20,500.00 Treatment,Type 11 Each 1-7. 4.000 Bridge Approach Section Each $2,625.00 $10,500.00 1-8. 476.000 Fabric Silt Fence, $5.50 $2,618.00 Low Porosity Lin.Ft. 1-9. 1.000 Covercrop Seeding Acres $750.00 $750.00 1-10. 4,840.000 Erosion Control, Class ID Sq.Yds. $1.54 $7,453.60 1-11. 1.000 Access Crossing Lump Sum $0.00 $0.00 1-12. 300.000 Temporary Silt Fence Lin.Ft. $5.50 $1,650.00 I-13. 1.000 Structural Steel for Substructure Lump Sum $30,000.00 $30,000.00 1-14. 10.000 21'Concrete Deck Slab Units Each $3,100.00 (' $371130-.08' 1-15. 10.000 31'Concrete Deck Slab Units Each $3,942.00 $39,420.00 1-16. 680.000 HP 10 in.x 42 lbs. Steel Piling Lin.Ft. $44.79 $30,457.20 1-17. 300.000 HP 12 in.x 53 lbs. $16,059.00 Steel Piling Lin.Ft. $53.53 1-18. 1,483.000 Steel Sheet Piling Sq.Ft. $19.69 $29,200.27 1-19. 100.000 Thrie Beam Guardrail Lin.Ft. $42.00 $4,200.00 1-20. 140.000 HP loin,x42lbs. $64.55 $9,037.00 Test Pile Lin.Ft. 1-21. 75.000 HP 12 in.x 53 lbs. Test Pile Lin.Ft. $81.53 $6,114.75 TOTAL FOR C-65(616) CONSTRUCTION OF THREE SPAN CONCRETE DECK SLAB BRIDGE,C1-490 ITEM PLAN ITEM UNIT NO. QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNITS PRICE AMOUNT 2-1. 1.000 Mobilization Lump Sum $55,254.72 $55,254.72 2-2. 1.000 Site Preparation Lump Sum $9,650.00 $9,650.00 2-3. 2,985000 Earthwork Measured in Embankment Cu.Yds. $10.47 $31,252.95 2-4. 88.000 24"Corrugated Metal Drive Pipe Lin Ft. $30.45 $2,679.60 2-5. 172.000 Crushed Rock Surface Course Tons $46.33 $7_,968.76 2-6. 4.000 Guardrail End Treatment,Type II Each $2,625.00 $10,500.00 2-7. 4.000 Bridge Approach Section Each $2,625.00 $10,500.00 2-8. 923.000 Fabric Silt Fence, Low Porosity Lin.Ft. $5.50 $5,076.50 2-9. 1.300 Covercrop Seeding Acres $750.00 $975.00 2-10. 6,292.000 Erosion Control, $1.53 $9,626.76 Class ID Sq.Yds. 2-11. 1.000 Access Crossing Lump Sum $0.00 $0.00 2-12. 300.000 Temporary Silt Fence Lin.Ft. $5.50 $1,650.00 2-13. 1.000 Structural Steel for Substructure Lump Sum $42)500.00 $42,5°°.00 2-14. 20.000 Concrete Deck Slab Units(21') Each $2,907.00 $58,140.00 2-15. 10.000 Concrete Deck Slab Units(31') Each $4,141.00 $41,410.00 2-16. 720.000 HP 10 in.x 42 lbs. $31,320.00 Steel Piling Lin.Ft. $43.50 2-17. 600.000 HP 12 in.x 53 lbs. Steel Piling Lin.Ft. $53.30 $31,980.00 2-18. 1,787.000 Steel Sheet Piling Sq.Ft. $19.65 $35,114.55 2-19. 142.000 Thrie Beam Guardrail Lin.Ft. $49.17 $6,982.14 2-20. 140.000 HP 10 in.x 42 lbs. $78.50 $10,990.00 Test Pile Lin.Ft. 2-21. 150.000 HP 12 in.x 53 lbs. Test Pile Lin.Ft. $80.00 $12,000.00 TOTAL FOR C1-490 $415,570.98 TOTAL FOR PROJECT $741,602.48 . The Contract will be awarded based on TOTAL FOR PROJECT in conjunction with the Nebraska County Purchasing Act. Each county reserves the right to construct any or all of the roadway items.A separate contract will be prepared for each county. We understand that this will be a lump sum contract and the total contract amount will be obtained by multiplying the Plan Quantities by the associated Unit Prices. If awarded the contract,we will furnish a surety bond and certificates of insurance as indicated in the Contract Documents. As specified in the Notice to Bidders, we hereby submit this BID BOND CERTIFIED CHECK in the amount of$Bond Included (5%of total bid).This bond will become the property of Nuckolls County if an award is offered within thirty days after the bid opening and we,as the successful bidder,fail to enter into a contract with Nuckolls County. The Undersigned agrees to correct any failures resulting from faulty work appearing within TWELVE(12)MONTHS after final payment. Start of Construction Date C-65(616): September 1, 2020 End of Construction Date C-65(616): November 4, 2020 • Start of Construction Date C1-490: October 1, 2020 End of Construction Date C1-490: December 4, 2020 Sincerely, C:;=?Jt4A4.ald (signature) Pat Gubbels (printed name) President (ode) Theisen Construction, Inc. (0 y) PO Box 97, Norfolk, NE 687020097 (address) 402379-'4564 (telephone) Adams County budget preparer, Dawn Miller, requested the board consider approving a 1%override for the 2020-2021 budget,as they have done in years past. Motion by Thomsen, seconded by Stromer to approve a 1% budget override for the 2020/2021 budget year. Roll Call;Ayes:Stromer, Larsen, Hogan,Thomsen, Curtis, Neumann,Orthmann. Nays: None Adams County IT Director, Ron Kucera, presented the board with a renewal of the Interlocal agreement between Adams County and the City of Hastings for GIS services. Kucera has reviewed the agreement and is requesting board approval. Motion by Thomsen, seconded by Neumann to approve the interlocal agreement between Adams County and the City of Hastings for GIS services. EXHIBIT A:AMENDMENTS The cost sharing of the contracts are not to be allocated as set forth in the Interlocal Agreement for GIS dated ,day of 2020 and is required to be divided amongst the parties as set forth below. Vendor: ESRI Purpose:ESRI ELA Licensing Reason for inconsistent division: Per ESRI Licensing Requirements,the County and City are not allowed to share ELA licensing. However,the County and City share GIS Websites that utilize the ELA licensing. Amended Division:County will pay 14%of the ESRI ELA licensing.City will pay balance and allocated 50%its payment as an expense of its utilities. Vendor:ROK Technologies Purpose:Cloud Hosting and Managed Services of the GIS Websites&GIS Enterprise Reason for inconsistent division:The City's Utilities require a SQL Server for their GIS needs that the rest of the parties will not utilize. City and its Utilities,with future GIS enterprise advancements,may require additional hosting needs that the County will not utilize. Amended Division:City will pay 2/3 of the base deployment of Managed Services and County will pay 1/3 of base deployment of Managed Services and cloud hosting. Base deployment currently totals $16,620.00.Utilities will pay the cost of the SQL Server.City and its Utilities will each pay%a of the difference. In the event the base deployment increases,County must be notified of the change and revisions to the breakdown will be applied. CITY OF HASTINGS,NEBRASKA a Municipal Corporation Mayor ATTEST: (SEAL) City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ADAMS COUNTY,NEBRASKA Attest a Body Politic and Corporation Ramona Thomas,County Clerk Date: By: Lee Hogan,Chairperson ,JNTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR GIS ................. . {neat Cate a.w,ged THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT(Agreement)is made on this day of 24142020,by and between the CITY OF HASTINGS, NEBRASKA,a Municipal Corporation(City)and ADAMS COUNTY,NEBRASKA,a Political Subdivision(County). WHEREAS the parties wish to develop,implement and maintain a geographic information system(GIS)that can be utilized by each party. WHEREAS the costs of developing,implementing and maintaining GIS can be extensive,and the need for each party to do so independently would be wasteful. FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,the parties agree as follows: I.COST SHARING: 1.1 The City of Hastings shall serve as the acquisition agent. 1.2 The City is sail ogy of the cost and;Titre County ard1Hastings-Utilities shall rash-pay 1/3 of the cost for the development,implementation and maintenance of the GIS. 1.3 As costs are incurred,the City will sand an invoice to the County and Haetings-Utilities-for that porties'their share of the amount due. Payment will be made forty five(45)days after receipt of an Invoice. 2.MANNER OF FINANCING AND MAINTAINING OF BUDGET: 2.1 Each party shall adopt and maintain appropriations,as required by law,to fund its obligations under this Agreement. 2.2 Expenditure for purchase of equipment,software,etc.are contemplated to be $43N0,000 annually;but may be adjusted based on approved budgets agreed on by all parties. 3.GIS ADVISORY BOARD 3.1 A GIS Advisory Board is hereby created to facilitate the purchases, installation,development,operation and management of the GIS(the"Board's Mission").The GIS Advisory Board may adopt such roles for its functions as the GIS Advisory Board deems necessary to carry out the applicable provisions of this Agreement Decisions of the GIS Advisory Board do not bind the parties to any obligations under this Agreement. Such decisions must still be unanimously adopted and ratified as amendments to this Agreement if the decision is not consistent with the terms of this Agreement. 3.2 The Advisory Board Shall: a. consist of one representative from City of Hastings;-eae fepreset tativefrer-Hastings-[Utilities and one representative from Adams County. b. meet as necessary to share information and to fulfill the Board's Mission. 3.3 Identify emerging enhancements for the GIS System and/or use. From time to time determine whether such technological levels should be changed. 4. TERM: This Agreement shall commence on 1a day of October,202044,and shall terminate on the 30"day of September,28282025. The parties may renew this Agreement by mutual consent,and under such terms and conditions as determined by the parties at that time. 5.TERMINATION:This Agreement may be terminated by consent of both parties. 6.NOTICE:Notice on each party may be made by sending the notice by regular U.S. Mar to the individual noted below: - City of Hastings Dave-WaekerLee Vrooman 1228 N.Denver,Ave220 N.Hastings Ave Hastings NE 68901, 402-11:0:-Box-1-08-5 46-1-2-2-3-383657 Hastings-Utilities Marv-Sehultee-1228#Detwet;Ave:T Hating-NE-6898.6 463 1371 Adams County Ron Kucera 500 West 4"'St Hastings,NE 68901 402-461-7127 7.ACCESS TO PRODUCTS:Each party shall have access to the GIS without restriction. 8.CHOICES OF LAWS:This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the United States of America and the State of Nebraska. 9.AMENDMENTS:Amendments to this Agreement shall be made in writing,duly approved and executed by all parties hereto and made a part of this Agreement by reference via Exhibit A:Amendments: 10.ENTIRE AGREEMENT:This Agreement and any subsequent amendments shall constitute the entire agreement among the parties.Each party to this agreement shall execute duplicate copies of this agreement and provide one executed copy to the City. The parties agree that the separately executed copies of this agreement which shall constitute the Interlocal Cooperative Agreement for GIS shall be given full force and effect. CITY OF HASTINGS,NEBRASKA a Municipal Corporation Mayor ATTEST: (SEAL) City Cleric APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ADAMS COUNTY,NEBRASKA Attest a Body Politic and Corporation Ramona Thomas,County Clerk Date: By: 6teekNetifliftanLee Hogan,Chairperson Adams County Deputy Attorney, David Bergin, presented the board with an agreement between Adams County and the Lancaster County Youth Services. Bergin has reviewed the contract and is recommending approval. Motion by Curtis,seconded by Larsen to approve the youth services agreement presented by Bergin. Roll Call;Ayes:Stromer, Larsen, Hogan,Thomsen, Curtis, Neumann,Orthmann. Nays: None Youth Services Center (:. 1200 Radcliff Street 1Lincoln,NE 68512 Phone(402)441-7090 N�T t.etvcnsrrsa Fax(402)441-5626 July 14,2020 Adams County Clerk PO Box 2067 Hastings,NE 68901 RE:Agreement with the Lancaster County Youth Services Center for juvenile detention services. The Lancaster County Youth Services Center('Center)is updating our detention contracts this year.Our records indicate that we have an existing contract with your County.A copy of the new contract was left out of the mailing you received last week.Please find that now enclosed. If your County is interested in continuing to utilize the Center for Juvenile detention services,please have your County Board sign the enclosed copy of the contract. Next,return the signed cony to the Center.We will then present the contract to the Lancaster County Board for approval.After all signatures are acquired for the contract,we will return a copy to you for your files. Here Is a list of some highlights of the contract: • This contract is for holding pre-adjudicated youth,youth held on adult charges or out-of-state runaways in the Center for the requesting County. • The requesting County is responsible for the cost of at medical care including pharmaceuticals. • The requesting County is responsible the cost of emergency transportation and/or any instance where one-to- one supervision is required to ensure the safety of the youth. • We are requesting a rate of$300 per day.The actual cost to house a youth per day is$571.The Lancaster County Board is requesting a rate much lower than our actual operational costs to serve youth from other Counties.Increases in the per diem rate may be considered in the future in order to capture a greater portion of our actual costs. Finally,pursuant to our existing contract with your County,either party may terminate the existing contract with at least thirty(30)days'written notice.This letter constitutes written notice that our existing contract shall terminate forty-five (45)days from the date of this letter. if you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact me at 402-441-8659 or email at mhood@iancaster.ne.gov. Sincerely, Melissa Hood, YSC Administrator Enclosure(s)-1 DETENTION SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT,is made and entered into this_day of ,20 , by and between the County of ,Nebraska,hereinafter referred to as"County"and the County of Lancaster,Nebraska,through the Lancaster County Youth Services Center,hereinafter referred to as the"Youth Services Center." Individually,the County and the Youth Services Center may be referred to as a"Party,"and collectively they may be referred to as"Parties." WHEREAS,the Interlocal Cooperation Act,Neb.Rev.Stat.§§13-801 et.seq.,provides that two or more public agencies may enter into agreement for joint and cooperative exercise of powers,privileges,or authority capable of being exercised by either agency; WHEREAS, both Parties to this Agreement are political subdivisions of the State of Nebraska; WHEREAS,the Youth Services Center is a juvenile detention facility,as defined by Neb Rev.Stat.§83-4,125; WHEREAS,the County desires that the Youth Services Center assume the safekeeping, care,and sustenance of certain Juveniles,as defined in the Nebraska Juvenile Code,Neb.Rev. Stat. §§43-245 et seq., held as detainees by the County under the County's lawful authority pursuant to statutes made and provided in such cases. Such Juveniles shall include only the following detainees held by the County:Juveniles held in pre-adjudicated status,on adult charges, or as out-of-state runaways; WHEREAS,the Youth Services Center is willing to perform this service for the County under certain terms and conditions;and WHEREAS,the Parties wish to reduce their understanding to writing; NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, it is agreed as follows by the Parties hereto: 1. Youth Services Center Services. The Youth Services Center will assume the safekeeping, care,and sustenance of Juveniles held by the County under the County's lawful authority. Said safekeeping, care, and sustenance shall include services, procedures, and operations required by the Juvenile Detention Standards,Title 83 Nebraska Administrative Code ("Juvenile Detention Standards"). 2. Per Diem Charges. In consideration of the safekeeping,care,and sustenance provided by the Youth Services Center,the County shall pay the Youth Services Center the sum of$300.00 per Juvenile per day. This rate shall be referred to as"the Per Diem Rate." For the purpose of this Section 2,a"day"shall be measured in four 6-hour increments and billed as follows: (a) 25%of the Per Diem Rate($75.00)for a stay less than or equal to six hours; (b) 50%of the Per Diem Rate($150.00)for a stay over six hours but less than or equal to twelve hours; (c) 75%of the Per Diem Rate($225.00)for a stay over twelve hours but less than or equal to eighteen hours; (d) 100%of the Per Diem Rate($300.00)fora stay over eighteen hours but less than or equal to twenty-four hours. 2.1. Adjusted Per Diem Charges. At least 60 days,but not more than 90 days,prior to the conclusion of the Initial Term or any Renewal Term,Youth Services Center may notify the County of an adjustment to the Per Diem Rate for the upcoming Renewal Term. This adjusted rate shall be referred to as"the Adjusted Per Diem Rate." Unless the Agreement is terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement,on the first day of the Renewal Term that follows the date of the notification of the Adjusted Per Diem Rate,the Adjusted Per Diem Rate shall replace the Per Diem Rate for purposes of Section 2 of this Agreement. 3. Additional Charges. In addition to the Per Diem Charges described in Section 2 of this Agreement,the County shall pay to the Youth Services Center. (a) The actual cost of medical care,including medication(s),that is required by the Juvenile while the Juvenile is in the custody of the Youth Services Center and that is not provided by the Youth Services Center's medical contractor("Medical Care"). (b) The actual cost of repairing property damage caused by the Juvenile while the Juvenile is in the custody of the Youth Services Center. (c) The hourly rate of the employee(s)assigned to one-to-one supervision of the Juvenile during those hours one-to-one supervision is provided when,in the sole discretion of the Youth Services Center,the Youth Services Center deems one-to-one supervision to be necessary for the safety and security of the Juvenile. (d) The cost of emergency transportation provided pursuant to Section 8 of this Agreement as follows:the hourly rate of the employee(s)assigned to one- to-one supervision of the Juvenile throughout the duration of the emergency transportation,plus mileage at the current mileage rate established by the State of Nebraska Department of Administrative Services pursuant to Neb. Rev.Stat.§81-1176,as amended. 4. Invoice. For the Per Diem Charges described in Section 2 and the Additional Charges described in Section 3(b)through 3(d),the Youth Services Center shall submit to the County itemized billing statements in the calendar month following the calendar month of the Juvenile's discharge from the Youth Services Center. The billing statement shall be sent by U.S. Mail to the billing contact address provided in Section 4.1 of this Agreement. Such statements shall include: (a) the name and date of birth of each Juvenile held; (b) the name of person authorizing detention; (c) the dates and times of admittance and discharge; (d) the length of stay; (e) the Per Diem Charges for each Juvenile described in Section 2 of this Agreement;and (t) the Additional Charges for each Juvenile described in Section 3(b)through 3(d)of this Agreement. All charges on the billing statement shall be paid by the County within 30 days from the date of the billing statement. With respect to the Additional Charges provided for by Section 3(a)of this Agreement,the County hereby authorizes the Youth Services Center to request each provider of Medical Care to directly invoice the County for the provision of such Medical Care. The County shall pay each such invoice for Medical Care according to the terms of such invoice. In addition,in the event that any provider of Medical Care does not directly invoice the County and instead invoices the Youth Services Center,the Youth Services Center hereby delegates and assigns,and the County hereby accepts such delegation and assignment of,the Youth Services Center's duties and rights arising out of each invoice for Medical Care. Immediately upon receipt of each such invoice for Medical Care,the Youth Services Center shall forward that invoice to the County's billing contact as provided in Section 4.1 of this Agreement for the County to process payment directly from the County to the invoicing person or entity pursuant to the terms of the invoice. 4.1 Billing Contact. Each Party shall designate a contact person to handle invoicing, billing questions,and disputes. Such person's contact information is specified below. A Party may change this designation by providing ten(10)business days'notice in writing to the other Party's designee listed in the Notices section of this Contract. COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES CENTER [NAME] Melissa Hood 1"1Il LE] YSC Administrator [ADDRESS] Lancaster County Youth Services Center [PHONE] 1200 Radcliff [EMAIL] Lincoln,NE 68512 402-441-8659 mHood@lancaster.ne.gov 5. Authorized Individuals. Prior to the admittance of any Juveniles to the Youth Services Center,the County shall provide the Youth Services Center with a written list of persons authorized to request placement and transportation. Such list shall include,for each individual, his or her position,employer,business address,and telephone number. 6. Written Notices of Admission and Discharge. The County shall make all requests for admission in writing in advance,and shall give all notices of discharge in writing in advance. 7. Reservation of Right to Refuse Admittance and Request Removal. The Youth Services Center reserves the right to refuse any request for admission,and may,at any time,require the County to remove and assume custody of any Juvenile. 8. Transportation. The Youth Services Center shall furnish transportation of the Juvenile only in the event of an emergency. The County shall be responsible for all other transportation to any and all areas outside the Youth Services Center,including transfers to all court appearances and routine medical,optical,and dental treatment. 8.1 Video Equipment. Upon written request from County to Youth Services Center, Youth Services Center agrees to make available to County for use in the Youth Services Center the Youth Service Center's equipment for video court and video visitation. 9. Admittance. At the time of admittance of any Juvenile,the County shall provide either: (a) a court order authorizing detention,which is in accordance with the state and federal laws governing the detention of juveniles;or (b) an advance verbal authorization followed by a court order within 24 hours of admission,except that a court order shall be required by the close of the next business day following an admission that occurs by verbal authorization on a weekend or legal holiday. 10. Release. Except in an emergency situation,the Youth Services Center will not permanently remove or release any County Juvenile without proper written authorization from the County,subject to the provisions to Section 7 of this Agreement. 11. Access. The County shall be granted reasonable arrPcs to the Youth Services Center facility for purposes of inspection and inquiry pertinent to the facility's general operation or detention of individuals held for the County. 12. Rules. The Youth Services Center shall provide,upon request, a copy of all pertinent policies and procedures relating to resident and visitor rules. 13. Non-discrimination. The Parties agree that in providing services pursuant to this Agreement,they shall not discriminate against any employee,applicant for employment,Juvenile, or any other person on the basis of race,color,religion,sex,disability,national origin,age,marital status,receipt of public assistance,or any other basis prohibited by applicable state or federal law. 14. Term. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by both Parties,and shall remain in full force and effect for an Initial Term of one year,unless terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. At the conclusion of the Initial Term and the conclusion of any Renewal Term,this Agreement shall automatically renew for a Renewal Term of one year,unless terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 15. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either Party by giving to the other Party written notice of its intention to terminate at least thirty(30)days prior to the proposed date of termination. In the event that County terminates this Agreement,Youth Services Center shall be entitled to payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement for any work performed that has been satisfactorily completed as of the termination date,and any costs incurred through the termination date. In addition,either Party may immediately terminate this Agreement,in whole or in part,if the other Party fails to perform its obligations under this Agreement in a timely and proper manner. Either Party may,by providing written notice of default to the other Party,allow the other Party to cure a failure or breach of this Agreement within a period of thirty(30)days or longer,at the non- breaching Party's discretion. Allowing the other Party time to cure a failure or breach of pontract does not waive the non-breaching Party's right to immediately terminate the Agreement for the same or different failure or breach of this Agreement that may occur at a different time. In the event that County terminates this Agreement,Youth Services Center shall be entitled to payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement for any work performed that has been satisfactorily completed as of the termination date,and any costs incurred through the termination date. 16. Independent Contractor. It is the express intent of the Parties that this Agreement shall not create an employer-employee relationship.Employees of the County shall not be deemed to be employees of the Youth Services Center and employees of the Youth Services Center shall not be deemed to be employees of the County. The Youth Services Center and the County shall be responsible to their respective employees for all salary and benefits. Neither the County's employees nor the Youth Services Center's employees shall be entitled to any salary,wages,or benefits from the other Party,including but not limited to overtime,vacation,retirement benefits, workers'compensation,sick leave or injury leave. The County shall also be responsible for maintaining workers'compensation insurance,unemployment insurance for its employees,and for payment of all federal,state,local and any other payroll taxes with respect to its employees' compensation. 17. Hold Harmless. Each Party agrees to save and hold harmless,to the fullest extent allowed by law,the other Party and its principals,officers,and employees from and against all claims,demands,suits,actions,payments,liabilities,judgments and expenses(including court- ordered attorneys'fees),arising out of or resulting from the acts or omissions of their principals, officers,or employees in the performance of this Agreement. Liability includes any claims, damages,losses,and expenses arising out of or resulting from performance of this Agreement that results in any claim for damage whatsoever including any bodily injury,civil rights liability, sickness,disease,or damage to or destruction of tangible property,including any loss of use resulting therefrom. Further,each Party shall maintain a policy or policies of insurance(or a self- insurance program),sufficient in coverage and amount to pay any judgments or related expenses from or in conjunction with any such claims.Nothing in this Agreement shall require either Party to indemnify or hold harmless the other Party from liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of said other Party or its principals,officers,or employees. 18. Integration. The Parties hereby agree that this Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the Parties and supersedes all prior contracts, agreements and negotiations between the Parties whether verbal or written. 19. Forbearance Not Waiver.Youth Services Center's failure or neglect to enforce any of its rights under this Agreement will not be deemed to be a waiver of Youth Services Center's rights. 20. Notices. Except for billing and invoicing conducted pursuant to Sections 4 and 4.1 of this Agreement,all other notices,request for services,or other communications provided under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given to the Youth Services Center or the County at the email address set forth below or such other email address as either may specify hereafter in writing: COUNTY: YOUTH SERVICES CENTER: [NAME] Intake/Release Staff [TITLE] [EMAIL ADDRES] Lancaster County Youth Services Center YouthIntake@lancaster.ne.gov Such notice or other communication shall be emailed,return receipt requested. For the purpose of the Agreement,all notices will be deemed to have been given upon the date of delivery as proved by the return receipt referenced above. 21. Third Party Rights.This Agreement is not intended to,and does not,create any rights or benefits on behalf of any person,whether an individual or an entity,other than the Parties to this Agreement. Youth Services Center shall not be obligated or liable hereunder to any person, whether an individual or an entity,other than County. 22. Venue. If either Party brings against the other Party any proceeding arising out of this Agreement,that Party may bring that proceeding against the other Party only and exclusively in the Lancaster County District Court in Lincoln,Nebraska,and each Party hereby submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of that court for purposes of any such proceeding. 23. Assignment. County may not assign this Agreement or any rights, interest, or obligations hereunder,by operation of law or otherwise,without prior written consent of Youth Services Center. Any assignment by County without Youth Services Center's prior written consent shall be absolutely void. 24. Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be liable for any failure of or delay in the performance of this Agreement for the period that such failure or delay is due to causes beyond its reasonable control, including but not limited to acts of God, war, strikes or labor disputes, embargoes,government orders,or any other force majeure event EXECUTED BY THE COUNTY,this day of ,20^. BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/SUPERVISORS OF COUNTY, NEBRASKA Approved as to form this day of County Attorney Deputy Attorney Bergin presented the board with a land lease agreement between Adams County and Clint Bostock for the lease of land at the proposed justice center site. Bostock had be haying the land prior to the county purchasing the land although there was no written contract'between the previous owner(Butler Machinery)and Mr. Bostock. Attorney Bergin recognized that Adams County Clerk, Ramona Thomas, questioned the need for a land lease of surplus land go through the public hearing and public bid process. Attorney Bergin stated he felt is was"not necessary to put out to lease"due to his interpretation of the statute and the short term for which the lease would be in effect. Adams County Planning and Zoning Director,Judy Mignery, stated she agreed the land lease should be put out for public bid. Chairman Hogan questioned hiring Bostock to hay it, as it provides maintenance of the property.Clerk Thomas inquired if Bostock's payment could be in the form of the hay removed from the grounds. Bergin stated yes,that could be done if the board wished. Motion by Thomsen, seconded by Stromer to approve the land lease between Adams County and Clint Bostock. Roll Call;Ayes:Stromer, Larsen, Hogan,Thomsen,Curtis, Neumann,Orthmann. Nays: None CASH FARM LEASE THIS CASH FARM LEASE (the-Lease")is entered into between Adams County.a Political Subdivision of the State of Nebraska. ("Landlord") and Clint Bostock ("Tenant"). retroactively effective upon May 27. 2020(the"Effective Date"). In consideration of the rents and covenants provided for in this Lease.Landlord agrees to lease to Tenant the described real estate described in "Exhibit A" for agricultural purposes (the "Leased Premises")on the following terms and conditions: 1. Term. This Lease shall be in effect from the Effective Date through December 31.2020. The Term shall automatically renew for additional periods of 12 months unless a party gives the other party 30 days written notice prior to the expiration of the then-current tens. 2. Rental. Tenant agrees to pay Landlord the sum of$1.00 per year for the Leased Premises. Such payment shall be made no later than January 31 each year. Landlord acknowledges payment for the year 2020. 3. Permitted Uses. The Leased Premises shall be used only for planting and harvesting oats and hay and for no other purposes. 4. Course of Husbandry. Tenant shall operate the Leased Premises in accordance with practices of good husbandry and shall use good fanlike and ranching methods and shall not overgraze or engage in or permit any practice which shall result in erosion of topsoil or otherwise adversely affect the premises or the fertility of the soil. 5. Maintenance of Leased Premises. Tenant shall keep the Leased Premises neat and orderly and free from rubbish or waste. 6. Prevention of Noxious Weeds. Tenant agrees to conduct a good weed control program on the farm at the Tenant's own expense. 7. No Filling or Drainage. Tenant is prohibited from undertaking any ground filling or drainage activities on the Leased Premises without the written consent of Landlord.including trenching or digging for the purpose of such drainage. 8. No Burning. Tenant shall not engage in burning of any kind on the Leased Premises. This ban includes burning any portion of the Leased Premises. as well as burning any material located or placed on the Leased Premises. 9. No Structures. Tenant shall not erect or place any structures.permanent or temporary.upon the Leased Premises. "Structures" shall include.but not be limited to. shacks and stands used for hunting. 10. Vehicles and Equipment. Tenant shall bring vehicles and equipment onto the Leased Premises for farming and ranching purposes only. Tenant shall not bring vehicles or equipment onto the Leased Premises for any other purpose. 11. Assignment/Subleasing. Tenant may not assign its rights under this Lease sublease all or any portion of the Leased Premises without Landlord's written consent. 12. Income. Tenant shall receive all income raised from growing alfalfa on the Leased Premises during the Term. 13. Government Payments. Tenant shall receive any and all government payments which may be allocated to the use of the Leased Premises during the Term,whether for participation in any agricultural program or by way of relief from crop failure or disaster,or otherwise. To the extent any of the foregoing payments are made to Landlord instead of Tenant.such payments shall be paid by Landlord to Tenant. 14. Real Estate Taxes.Landlord shall be responsible for the payment of all real estate taxes levied by any authority against the Leased Premises. 15. Ditches.The Tenant shall cut the roadside ditches in the fall in compliance with Nebraska law requirements for cutting ditches. 16. Inspection. Landlord shall have the right to enter the Leased Premises for the purpose of inspecting the same at any time so long as the same shall not interfere with the use of the Leased Premises by Tenant. 17. Hold Harmless. Tenant shall hold Landlord harmless and indemnify Landlord from any and all damages,cost.and expense by reason of claims,demands,or suits by third-parties caused by Tenant'operations on the Leased Premises. 18. Liability Insurance. Tenant shall obtain and maintain a policy or policies covering general liability in an amount of at least 51.000.000. Landlord shall be named as additional insured and Tenant shall obtain a 30 day notice of cancellation endorsement and provide proof of same to Landlord. Tenant shall also obtain a waiver of subrogation endorsement. 19. Default. Tenant's failure to fulfill any condition in this Lease or to pay the rent when due,if not cured within 30 days'notice of such breach from Landlord(to the extent such breach is capable of being cured.)shall be a default and Landlord.at the expiration of such 30-day notice period,shall be entitled to reenter and take possession without the same working a forfeiture of rents to be paid as provided for under the terms of this Lease,or a waiver of any covenants to be performed by Tenant. In the event of such default.Tenant agrees to peacefully surrender his possession without delay. A waiver by Landlord of any default or breach under this agreement by Tenant shall not be construed to be a continuing waiver of such default or breach. nor a waiver in any manner of a breach or default subsequently occurring. 20. Termination. Tenant will,at the termination of the Tenn,peacefully surrender possession of the Leased Premises to Landlord. and shall inunediately remove all personal property or commodities owned by Tenant,or its affiliates,successors,agents,or assigns. 21. Hunting Rights. Landlord shall retain exclusive hunting rights to the Leased Premises Property and no individual,including Tenant and its invitees shall hunt the Leased Premises without permission from the Landlord. 22. Time of Essence. Time shall be of the essence for the performance of every covenant in this Lease and for the payment of rent. 23. No Recording. Neither party shall record this Lease without the written consent of the other party. 24. Binding Effect of Lease. This Lease shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties to this Lease,their heirs,successors,and assigns. 25. Counterparts. This Lease may be executed in one or more counterparts,all of which taken together shall constitute one instrument. This Lease may be signed by facsimile.PDF.or other electronic means,and such signatures shall be as binding on the party providing the same as original signatures. 26. Choice of Law. This Lease shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Nebraska,and any disputes under this Agreement shall be resolved solely in the state or federal courts encompassing Adams County,Nebraska,as jurisdiction may properly lie. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this Lease to be executed as of the day and year first written above. Signed July .2020. LANDLORD TENANT ADAMS COUNTY, A POLITICAL CLINT BOSTOCK SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. nA 1 By: C asst,GE Lee Hogan. Chairman of the Adams Clint Bostock County Board of Supervisors Attest:Ramona Thomas.County Clerk: 3 Exhibit A Description of the Property Approximately 10 square acres of property located in the northwest corner of the tract of ground in the Northwest Quarter (NWIi4) of Section Twenty-Four (24), Township Seven (7) North, Range Ten (10) West of the 6th P.M., Adams County, NE,described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the South line of the NI/2NW114 of said section and the East line of Highway 281, as said line is described in deed to the State of Nebraska recorded in Book 122, Page 533, Deed Records of said county; running thence East along said South line of the NI12,NW 114,a distance of 1592': thence southerly on a straight line approximately 2643'to the North line of the S 112,SW 1;4 of said Section 24; thence West along said North line of the S 1,2SW 114 a distance of 1542' to said East line of Highway 281; thence northerly along said East line of Highway 281 a distance of 2644' to the point of beginning,containing approximately 95.I acres. At 10:00 am,Attorney Bergin, addressed the board regarding the continuance of the isolated land hearing. Bergin stated the board is to discuss and possibly take action on determining the value of real property to be taken from adjacent land owners,to build an access road allowing Maxine Strasburg access to her section of land. Attorney Doug Pauley spoke on behalf of his client Maxine Strasburg.Attorney Pauley presented what they feel is an appropriate amount of damages payable to the affected land owners. Pauley also requested the board reconsider the width of the road as they believe the width would only need to be fifteen feet for adequate access and this would limit the damages to the affected land owners. Proposed damage amounts presented by Doug Pauley on behalf of Maxine Strasburg: DAMAGES Re: Maxine Strasburg Isolated Land Loyal E. &Mary A. Smith SE "4 9-5-10,Adams Co., NE, EXCEPT 4.55 A Gregg R. Lay SW 'i4 9-5-10, Adams Co., NE, EXCEPT Bachman Acres 1. Access road of 15 feet REQUESTED by Petitioner, 7.5 feet on each side of Section Line. Length of access road = 2,640 feet Width of access road= 15 feet (7.5 feet on each side) 2,640 x 7.5 = 19,800 square feet_43,560= .45 acres Total amount from Smiths 19,800 square feet or .45 acres 100°'o of assessed value of irrigated = $588,784.50 or$7,171.55/acre $7,171.55 x.45 = $3,227.20 Total amount from Lay 19,800 square feet or .46 acres 100°'o of assessed value of irrigated = $723,121.12 or$7,286.59/acre $7,286.59 x .45 =$3,278.97 2. Access road of 33 feet GRANTED, 16.5 feet on each side of Section Line. Length of access road= 2,640 feet Width of access road = 33 feet (16.5 feet on each side) 2,640 x 16.5 = 43,560 square feet 43,560 square feet= 1 acre Total amount from Smiths 43,560 square feet or 1 acre 100%of assessed value of irrigated =$358,784.50 or$7,171.55/acre $7,171.55 x 1 = $7,171.55 Total amount from Lay 43,560 square feet or 1 acre 100°o of assessed value of irrigated = $723,121.12 or$7,286.59/acre $7,286.59 x 1 =$7,286.59 Attorney Elizabeth Lay spoke on behalf of her client Greg Lay regarding damages due to him based on the board's action on July 7, 2020. Attorney Lay requested that Chairman Hogan allow her to submit an exhibit outlining their proposal on what is fair damages due to Mr. Lay. Chairman Hogan allowed Attorney Lay submitting their estimate of damages into the record. 4100.Farm Credit Services ofAmedca Collateral Analysis and Monitoring Summary /wpm lsal and Trensactton Inforrnetlog Customer Lay,Gregg Appraiser. Jenkins,Jodi R (388JL) Loan Amount 250K lo Total/ es: 153.04 T1N: Appraisal Request Date: 03101/2012 CIF: 38675 Flfeolion Value Date: 03/1912012 Nate: 201 Date Inspected: Application ID: 6113970 091ca: Grand Wand Financial Officer: Bachman,MIchati E Markel Value/Rae: 38.012 Valuation Basis: As Is Improvements Value: 30 Market Value: 1:420.000 Local Deaertptlort 3W4wtearoeotlest 93.10 /State NEBRASKA Coaalu• seen tet•40,612164 Lona•-9&4623431 1.6Mica Sand.5 miles WofAyr (paudarai . - laseteal in, 1 l Tu IRuel RO[ vMsiyaT�aadd.o I AcI 11 SW4(except out acreage oniamb std.)end kraal toDeseams 4 S N W W amHPRICIPALmum 163.04 b the appraisal by MN am RAW fwttantaMNvoothatteal Condign*and Extraordinary Assure Irrigation: The market value assumes that adequate water rights and all irrigation equipment are included in the rights appraised and aro secured. • SRedriio Aeoraleel Reoulrements • Beare trrtga6on equipment as described In comments located in subject property description of this report • The well located on subject Is registered under the came of Ronald D.and Evelyn M.Katzberg. Value h this analysis Is subject to the name being changed on the well log at the MR0 and State Department of Water Resources to resect the name of the buyer of subject property based on information provided to the appraiser mending the sale and Included in this report Environmental Concsme: SIM wiexcepron 9-5.10:No Flood hazard DetamtMation Needed: SM vdexception 9-6-f0:Yes Grain bins of no value are located in the SW4SW4. Overall Surrtinary of Suktjoct i Production Value iptonnetton Collateral Claes: 3 Net lacune: $18,791 Capitalization Factor: 0.065 Production Value: 3258,322 %DCLMV: 22.00% Debt CcNerage Loan: *206,657 Denchmart Roiatlarsahlo-Land Benchmark 1: 854.0 %Hartclrmeric Value: 76,73 Farm Credit Services of America Summary Appraisal Report General Customer: Ley.Gregg Effective Value Dele:031t912012 Appraiser: Jenkins.Jac ct R • Date Inspected: Client FCS America Level of Inspecgon:Ds*Valuation Intended User: FCS America Appealed Purpose: talimatlng Current Market Value Intended Use: New Loan Appraisal Report Option as provided in Standard 2 of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice(USPAP):Summery Vab ation Bela: As l General Inforetelien 3W4 tWsxceptton ae-10 Rights Appraised: Fee Simple,Irdga$an lrrlprnerdt,Wale(fbgltts tmproven r e: below Average Salebtky: Average woos,and Deet Ueer Aorro.Awe Markean0 Ttmo: t D 3 Montle Property Type Ag-4dgatod Farm Exposure Time: I 133 Months Property Value Trend: Increasing SeiesAdhAty: United Aft Unit Tract Value 163.04 Acres $6,012►Aaro 3920,000 Oyerel SummarYof8uh,iert Tota Acres:153.04 %Cropland:79.11 %Improvements:0.00 %Leased AU:0.00 PLnal thetmalq Market Vak s Acmes Were Total Vales As Is 153.04 $9,012 $920,000 $gegegogslHvnof totlest t:ondtflorfs ami Eztaotdk arvAssumotlona Irrigation: The market value assumes that adequate wafer rights and at Mallon equipment aro Included in the rights appraised and are secured. • yoeaicA mlaat Reauirgnents; • Secure irrigation equipment as described in comments located in subject property description of this report • The well located on subject is registered under the name of Ronald D.and Evelyn M.Katzberg. Value in this analysis Is subject to the name being changed on the well log at the NRD and State Department of Water Resources to reflect the name of the buyer of subject property based on information provided to the appraiser regarding the sale and Inducted In this report. (full exhibit submitted is an attachment to the end of the 8/4/2020 minutes) Brief discussion occurred among board members regarding the comparison of the Adams County Assessor's valuation to that of the amounts submitted each party. Discussion by the board turned to reconsidering the width of the road to fifteen feet. Attorney Lay objected to the discussion as a violation of open meeting law as the topic of the road width is not on the agenda. Extensive discussion occurred regarding who is responsible for taxes on the land taken for the road,and who is responsible for road maintenance. Deputy Bergin researched the issues and indicated it seems Strasburg would be responsible for the road maintenance. Supervisor Curtis requested assistance from Deputy Attorney Bergin in making a motion to continue the hearing and include an option of reconsidering the width of road to be constructed. Bergin stated;your motion would be to continue the issue regarding the taking of property and damages but including the possibility of changing the amount that is taken. Curtis asked for further clarification,clarifying the motion Bergin suggested addressed the road width, amount of land taken from land owers and could include the option of addressing a gate placement. Bergin confirmed the issues stated by Curtis could be addressed. Curtis stated; "that's my motion",seconded by Thomsen. Roll Call;Ayes:Stromer, Larsen, Hogan, Thomsen, Curtis, Neumann, Orthmann. Nays: None Discussion occurred regarding the date and time to continue the hearing. The clerk was directed to place the hearing continuance on the August 18, 2020 agenda at 10:30 a.m. Adams County Planning and Zoning Director;Judy Mignery presented the board with case#20-08.3, plans for the Ashley and Justen Subdivision,concurrent with Resolution 2020-08-04.02 to vacate Coats Family Farm. Mignery read the following into the record: ADAMS COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Judy Mignery,Zoning Director 500 N.Denver Ave.,Hastings,NE 68901 Phone: 402-461-7174 Fax: 402-461-7177 Office Hours: Monday—Thursday,8:00—12:00 and 1:00—4:00 DATE: August 3,2020 TO: Adams County Planning Commission&Board of Supervisors FROM: Zoning Staff--Judy Mignery,Director RE: Case#20-08.3—Ashley and Justen Subdivision concurrent with the vacation of Coats Family Farm Applicant: Justen and Ashley Nokes,2770 N. Liberty Ave,Juniata,NE Location: Coats Family Farms and a tract in the SW ''A Section 36-T8N-R11 W Zoned Use:Ag Zoning Administrator's Comments: The applicant would like to purchase additional land from Gottsch Enterprises LLC to increase the size of their current subdivision and build a new house. The proposed plat would contain 7.94 acres. They would like to create a subdivision containing two lots,the existing house on one lot and new house on other lot. The proposed subdivision contains a house on each of the proposed lots. A portion of the property was subdivided in 2012 as Coats Family Farms,the subdivision contained 6.36 acres. The applicant would like to vacate Coats Family Farms concurrently with the approval of the Ashley and Justen Subdivision. The Plat does not fall within the floodplain. This plat does fall within the necessary set back of Gottsch Feeding facility, an impact easement would be recommended to be filed with the filing of the plat. All requirements of the existing County and Village Subdivision Regulations and the Zoning Regulations have been met. Mignery stated the plans have been approved by the Adams County Planning and Zoning Board,and is being presented by county board approval. Mignery confirmed both the subdivision plans and the resolution to vacate can be made in one motion. Motion by Stromer to approve, seconded by Orthmann. Roll Call;Ayes:Stromer, Larsen, Hogan, Thomsen, Curtis, Neumann, Orthmann. Nays: None RESOLUTION No. VACATE"COATS FAMILY FARM" A Resolution of the Adams County Board of Supervisors,Adams County,Nebraska,vacating the subdivision"COATS FAMILY FARM"and providing for the filing of the same with the Register of Deeds; providing an effective date of this Resolution;and repealing any Resolution or other provisions in conflict herewith. It is hereby resolved that the Chairman and members of the Adams County Board of Supervisors of Adams County,Nebraska: Sections. That"COATS FAMILY FARM"described as: A tract of land located in the Southwest Quarter(SW'A)of Section 36,Township 8 North,Range 11 West of the 6th P.M.,Adams County,Nebraska,more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest Corner of the Southwest Quarter(SW'A)of Section 36,Township 8 North, Range 11 West of the 6th P.M.,Adams County,Nebraska,thence N00°00'00"E(Assumed Bearings)and along the west line of the said Southwest Quarter(SW'A)of said Section 36 a distance of 810.00 feet; running thence N89°25'23"E a distance of 264.60 feet; running thence S29°48'03"E a distance of 171.90 feet;running thence S00°00'00"W and parallel to the said west line a distance of 660.00 feet to point on the South line of the said Southwest Quarter(SW'l4);running thence S89°25'3T'W and along the said South line of the said Southwest Quarter(SW%)a distance of 350.02 feet,more or less to the point of beginning,is hereby VACATED. Section 2. Concurrent with this vacation is the creation of Ashley and Justen Subdivision,hereinafter to be known as Ashley and Justen Subdivision. Section 3. The County Clerk is hereby directed to certify this Resolution to the Register of Deeds of Adams County,Nebraska,to be recorded,all as provided by law. Section 4. Any Resolutions passed and approved prior to the passage and approval of this Resolution,and in conflict with its provisions,is hereby repealed. Section S. This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval as required by law,said effective date being COATS FAMILY FARM—VACATION CONCURRENT WITH CREATION OF ASHLEY AND JUSTEN SUBDIVISION HBREINAYtbR KNOWN AS ASHLEY AND JUSTEN SUBDIVISION Motion by: Second by: Vote: Aye Nay Passed and approved this day of ,2020. ATTEST': Adams County Board of Supervisors County Clerk Board Chairman County Clerk, Ramona Thomas, presented the board with Resolution 2020-08-04.03,which lists petty cash amounts authorized by the county board for various county offices. Motion to approve by Curtis, seconded by Neumann. Roll Call;Ayes:Stromer, Larsen, Hogan,Thomsen, Curtis, Neumann,Orthmann. Nays: None Resolution: 2020-08-04.03 WHEREAS,there are some departments and offices in Adams County government that have the need for petty cal accounts,and; WHEREAS,it is required that these petty cash accounts be approved by the Adams County Board of Supervisors,b hereby RESOLVED,that the petty cash accounts be created and approved by the Adams County Board of Supervisors for t following departments and offices in the amounts stated: ADAMS COUNTY CLERK: Petty Cash Fund-------------- –$250.00 Witness Fee Account— --------- $1000.00 Adams County Court: Petty Cash Fund------ — --$530.00 ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFF: Adams County Jail Revolving Food Account--- – – -------$4,500.00 Adams County Sheriff Revolving Account-- ------------$3,000.00 Adams County Sheriff--- Adams heriff—Adams County Sheriff Mileage Account--------- --- $25.00 Adams County Sheriff Fee Account– --- – ---$6,000.00 ADAMS COUNTY TREASURER: Petty Cash Fund(Shorts&Longs)— – - ----$100.00 ADAMS COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT: Petty Cash Fund-- – – - ---- -----$200.00 ADAMS COUNTY WEED DEPARTMENT: Petty Cash Fund-----__ ADAMS COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Petty Cash Fund------------------- --- – —$25.00 ADAMS COUNTY ATTORNEY: Petty Cash Fund----- ------ – -- – -$2,000.00 ADAMS COUNTY ASSESSOR: Petty Cash Fund---- --------- - —$15.00 Motion by: Seconded by: Approved this 4a'day of July,2020 Chairman Date Attest County Clerk Supervisor Thomsen presented a change order submitted by Oak Creek Engineering seeking additional funds for the Adams County Office Building parking lot, due to unforeseen conditions.Thomsen confirmed the increase could be up to an additional$84,272.00,with a portion of that being the responsibility of Howard's Glass. Adams County Maintenance Supervisor Tom Reichert spoke briefly of the poor subgrade conditions. Reichert placed Lance Harter,with Oak Creek Engineering on a conference call with the Board to confirm and further clarify the conditions in which they are dealing with. Adams County Highway Superintendent and Budget Preparer, Dawn Miller, asked for an estimate of Howard's Glass portion of the project. Harter estimated Howard's Glass' portion to be roughly$9,000.00, leaving the county's responsibility at roughly$75,272.00 Motion by Thomsen, seconded by Stromer to approve the change order. Roll Call;Ayes:Stromer, Larsen, Hogan,Thomsen,Curtis, Neumann, Orthmann. Nays: None OAK CREEK ENGINEERING August 1,2020 " Adams County Board of Supervisors 1 500 W 4'h Street,Ste 109 Hastings,NE 68901 Re: 2020 Office Building Parking Lot Concrete Paving OCE#14-C-3 Dear Board, Bituminous surface removal and excavation began in the north portion of the parking lot on June 27, 2020. It was discovered that the subgrade was is very poor condition,some areas even saturated under the old pavement. We anticipated having some spots that needed fixed,but a quantity of this magnitude was not foreseen. We have arrived at the option of excavating 1 foot of subbase from the site and placing crushed concrete. The crushed will better re-establish the base without needing to excavate deeper into the underlying soils. The following is a summary of what is being proposed by Change Order No. 1. North of the alley Status: Pavement removed,subbase preparation pending Board action. Quantity: 24,600 Sq,Ft.x I ft thick x 555.05/CY=$50,157 South of the alley Status: Removals have not been completed;cost assumes same base condition as north. Quantity: 14,300 Sq.Ft.x I It thick x$55.05/CY=$29,156 (potentially) A cost to incorporate fly ash into the base to aid in drying is also shown but will only be used if needed. Contractor will first attempt to disc and air-dry base before placing crushed concrete. There was a line item in the original bid of$3,600 to use earthen materials for unsuitable locations. If we were to stay with clay soil,we would need to excavate deeper into the subbase and the cost would end up similar to the crushed concrete option;likely adding an additional Ito 2 weeks more to the construction schedule than the crushed concrete option. It is our recommendation to use the crushed concrete for base at a potential project cost increase to Adams County of$74,772. Approximately$9,500 may be incurred to Howards Glass at their approval. Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Lance M.Harter,P.E. P.O.Box 1209 Kearney,NE 68848 Office(308)455-1152 CHANGE ORDER NO.1 Project: Application Date: July 31,2020 Adams County Office Building Parking Lot Concrete Paving Oak Creek Engineering.Project#14-C-3 Heartland Concrete Construction 9295 Osborne Dr West Hastings,NE 68901 CHANGE ORDER NO.I Item Description Approx. Unit Unit Price Cost No. Quantity ADD Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Material w/ 8A Crushed Concrete 1440 CY $ 55.05 S 79,272.00 18 1Fly Ash Base Stabilization((needed) 25 CY $ 200.00 $ 5,000.00 CONTRACT PRICE Adiustmen$ Original Contract Amount: $ 235,903.05 Net Adjustment by Change Order: $ 84,272.00 Adjustment including previous Change Orders: $ 84,272.00 Adjusted Contract Amount: $ 320,175.05 CONTRACT TIME Adjustment: The CONTRACT TIME will be increased by 14 days. ACCEPTANCE: Work changes referenced in Article 11 of the General Conditions. Contractor: By: Date: Engineer: By: Date: Owner: By: Date: Motion by Neumann, seconded by Larsen to approve the claims. Roll Call;Ayes:Stromer, Larsen, Hogan, Thomsen, Curtis, Neumann,Orthmann. Nays: None Claims will be paid by the county clerk out of their respective accounts. Motion by Curtis,seconded by Stromer to approve an officer report submitted by the Clerk of the District Court. Roll Call;Ayes:Stromer, Larsen, Hogan,Thomsen, Curtis, Neumann, Orthmann. Nays: None JUSB3419 Adams County Board Page 1 Monthly Fees/Fines Report Date 8/03/202 From 07/01/2020 to 07/31/2020 Time 10:21:4 Account Description Total Amount Petition 560.00 Information 53.00 Filing Fee - State 69.00 Automation Fee 560.00 Transcript of Lien 25.00 Probation Admn Enrollment Fee 120.00 Probation Fee (Monthly) 1,575.00 Probation Intensive Supervisio 600.00 NSC Education Fee 69.00 Dispute Resolution Fee 51.75 Indigent Defense Fee 207.00 Uniform Data Analysis Fee 70.00 Drug Ct Admin Enrollment Fee 30.00 Drug Ct Supry Fee 580.00 Drug Ct Local Fee 2,930.00 PRS Prob Fee (Monthly) 175.00 PRS Admn Enrollment Fee 430.00 Dissolution Fee 300.00 O`. Parenting Act Fund 1,050.00 I'-. J.R.F. 420.00 Filing Fee-JRF 414.004 PL $ Crime Victim Fund 2.00 Civil Legal Services Fund 41.00 L.E.I.F. 82.00 gyp, Legal Aid/Services Fund 135.00 Legal Aid/Services Fund 437.50 a' Issuance of Writ 5.00 S v 10% Bond Fee 400.00 S I " Complete Record 285.00 4 a. ' € Photocopy Fees 50.00 Interest on Bank Account 9.29 Court Costs 1,123.82 ,, County Court Fees 50.00 Service Fees 18.00 'v $ Substance Abuse Testing Fees 359.75 Offender Assessment Screening 10.00 , r Fines 850.00 Sup Ct Filing Fee 156.00 Spousal Support/Alimony 18,080.00 Property Settlement 11,450.66 Judgment (General) 5,610.15 Attorney Fees 1,715.87 Uncimd - Funds 775.00 Restitution 3,704.00 Passport Processing Fee-County 630.00 HHS Account 98.64 Bindover Ten Percent Bond 24,300.00 Refund 2,520.00 Bond 3,600.00 Sup Ct Cost Bond 75.00 Grand Total 86,862.43 Meeting adjourned by unanimous consent. COUNTY GENERAL FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 813.45 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 856. 95 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 1,596.45 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 813.45 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 958.45 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 638.00 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 1, 323.85 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 246.50 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 1, 974 .90 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 290.00 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 638.00 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 3, 678. 65 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 2, 364. 95 FIVE POINTS BANK,VICTIMS ASSISTANCE PROGRA 391.50 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 3, 314.70 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 276. 95 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 145.00 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 246.50 FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 566. 95 FAKES OFFICE SOLUTIONS,DATA PROCESSING COSTS 177.00 EAKES OFFICE SOLUTIONS, SUPPLIES - OFFICE 51.34 EAKES OFFICE SOLUTIONS, SUPPLIES - OFFICE 354 .08 HOMETOWN LEASING,EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OFFICE 340.30 BUSINESS WORLD PRODUCTS,SUPPLIES - OFFICE 42.58 CORNHUSKER PRESS INC, SUPPLIES - OFFICE 275. 63 EAKES OFFICE SOLUTIONS, SUPPLIES - OFFICE 27.42 HOMETOWN LEASING,COPY MACH RENT 199.00 VANGUARD APPRAISALS INC, DATA PROCESSING COSTS 20, 895.00 QUILL CORPORATION, SUPPLIES - VOTING 1,851.22 COMPUTER CONSULTANTS INC, DATA PROCESSING COSTS 131.40 HOMETOWN LEASING,EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OFFICE 898. 13 DEREK TERWEY,MENTAL HEALTH BOARD COSTS 133.00 RUANN ROOT,MENTAL HEALTH BOARD COSTS 57.00 JOHN C FOLCIK,MENTAL HEALTH BOARD COSTS 57.00 MICHELLE R. SMITH,MENTAL HEALTH BOARD COSTS 76.00 JENIFER KNUTH,MENTAL HEALTH BOARD COSTS 76.00 EAKES OFFICE SOLUTIONS, SUPPLIES - OFFICE 79. 98 HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES,MISCELLANEOUS 825.50 BOCKSTADTER & GLEN LAW LLC,ATTRNY FEES-COURT APPOINT 228.00 SKALKA & BAACK LAW FIRM,ATTRNY FEES-COURT APPOINT 3,749. 18 SKALKA & BAACK LAW FIRM,ATTRNY FEES-COURT APPOINT 5, 626. 90 SKALKA & BAACK LAW FIRM,ATTRNY FEES-COURT APPOINT 4, 683.45 SULLIVAN SHOEMAKER PC LLO,ATTRNY FEES-COURT APPOINT 845.50 SULLIVAN SHOEMAKER PC LLO,ATTRNY FEES-COURT APPOINT 5, 453.00 SULLIVAN SHOEMAKER PC LLO,ATTRNY FEES-COURT APPOINT 4,726.50 DEREK TERWEY,ATTRNY FEES-COURT APPOINT 1, 472.50 DEREK TERWEY,ATTRNY FEES-COURT APPOINT 4, 123.00 DEREK TERWEY,ATTRNY FEES-COURT APPOINT 2, 711.54 THEOBALD LAW OFFICE,ATTRNY FEES-COURT APPOINT 1, 897.00 BLACK HILLS ENERGY,UTILITIES 36.82 CULLIGAN OF HASTINGS,OTHER EQUIPMENT 253.00 CULLIGAN OF HASTINGS,CHEMICALS UN RES 226.25 DUTTON LAINSON CO,BLDG REPAIR-ACOB 487.57 EAKES OFFICE SOLUTIONS, JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 550.84 HARTLAND CLEANING SERVICES, JANITORIAL AGREEMENTS 6,777 .77 LOUP VALLEY LIGHTING INC, JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 491.93 MENARDS,COURTHOUSE BUILDING 394.91 PROFORMA BUSINESS WORLD,MISCELLANEOUS 1,026.46 RUTT'S HEATING & AIR CONDITION,HEATING AND AIR CONDITION 82.38 WOODWARDS DISPOSAL SERVICE,GARBAGE 547. 60 HOMETOWN LEASING,EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OFFICE 328.00 UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN,MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 34.01 TWILA BANKSON,MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 35.08 LYNN DEVRIES,MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 11.50 PATRICIA EVANS,MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 114.43 BAILEY JOHNSON,MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 9.20 JULIE OCHSNER,MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 13.80 GWEN RODOCKER,MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 11.50 RON SEYMOUR,MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 144. 90 CIVIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC,DUES,SUBS,REGIST,TRAINING 179. 95 COOPERATIVE PRODUCERS INC,EQUIPMENT - FUEL 41.20 CORNHUSKER PRESS INC, PRINTING/PUBLISHING 85.89 FAMILY ADVOCACY NETWORK,DUES, SUBS,REGIST,TRAINING 1, 000.00 GALLS LLC,UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 156.10 HASTINGS FORD-LINCOLN,EQUIPMENT - FUEL 70.82 HOMETOWN LEASING,OFFICE EQUIPMENT 174. 90 HOMETOWN LEASING,EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OFFICE 246.37 JANITOR INC, JANITORIAL AGREEMENTS 502.19 KENESAW MOTOR CO INC,EQUIPMENT - FUEL 211.50 KENESAW MOTOR CO INC,TRAVEL EXPENSES 50.55 LTA TOWING LLC,SHERIFF COSTS 150.00 PHELPS COUNTY SHERIFF,BOARD OF PRISONERS - FOOD 540.00 SANDHILLS ORAL &,MED-HOSP PRISONERS 410.00 SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES INC,COMMISSARY-PHONE CARDS 5, 559.30 DELL MARKETING LP,OFFICE EQ REPAIR 200.00 EAKES OFFICE SOLUTIONS, SUPPLIES - OFFICE 23.89 ELITE COURT REPORTING SERV INC,COURT RELATED COSTS 173. 65 HALL COUNTY SHERIFF,COURT RELATED COSTS 7.82 HALL COUNTY SHERIFF, JUVENILE COURT COSTS 9. 63 HOMETOWN LEASING,EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OFFICE 638.50 WILLIAM OUREN,AUTOPSY COSTS 300.00 PHYSICIANS LABORATORY PC,AUTOPSY COSTS 2, 595.00 RAF LLC,AUTOPSY COSTS 339.00 ALLO COMMUNICATIONS, INTERNET SERVICE 205.00 ALLO COMMUNICATIONS,TELEPHONE SERVICES 465. 90 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INTERNET SERVICE 399.00 DAS STATE ACCOUNTING,EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OFFICE 704.00 VERIZON WIRELESS,CELL PHONES 162.35 WINDSTREAM,TELEPHONE SERVICES 2, 193. 62 WINDSTREAM,TELEPHONE SERVICES 150.00 WINDSTREAM,TELEPHONE SERVICES 291.99 ADAMS COUNTY JAIL/SHERIFF,BOARD OF PRISONERS - FOOD 1, 568.87 ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL,MED-HOSP PRISONERS 78. 95 AUCA CHICAGO LOCKBOX, JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 73. 95 BERTS REXALL DRUGS INC,MED-HOSP PRISONERS 111.55 BIG G COMMERCIAL HARDWARE INC , JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 118. 60 CASH WA DISTRIBUTING,BOARD OF PRISONERS - FOOD 1,377.28 CENTRAL NEBRASKA NEUROLOGY,MED-HOSP PRISONERS 21.30 COMPUTER HARDWARE INC,OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1, 455.80 COMPUTER HARDWARE INC,OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1, 063. 95 CULLIGAN OF HASTINGS,MISCELLANEOUS 52.88 EAKES OFFICE SOLUTIONS, SUPPLIES - OFFICE 108. 12 EAKES OFFICE SOLUTIONS, JAIL SUPPLIES 60. 65 HASTINGS RADIOLOGY ASSOC PC,MED-HOSP PRISONERS 32.05 KEEFE SUPPLY COMPANY,COMMISSARY 1, 178.24 KEITHS PHARMACIES,MED-HOSP PRISONERS 318. 12 LEXINGTON REGIONAL HEALTH CNTR,MED-HOSP PRISONERS 8.41 MARY LANNING HEALTHCARE,MED-HOSP PRISONERS 10, 114.86 STATE OF NEBRASKA,BOARD OF PRISONERS - FOOD 8, 050.16 STATE OF NEBRASKA,MED-HOSP PRISONERS 2,550.28 US FOODS INC,BOARD OF PRISONERS - FOOD 512.99 YORK GENERAL HOSPITAL,MED-HOSP PRISONERS 67 .21 QUILL CORPORATION, SUPPLIES - OFFICE 109.96 CITY OF HASTINGS,AMBULANCE COSTS 5,208 .33 BAMFORD INC,MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 225.00 BIG G COMMERCIAL HARDWARE INC ,EQ REPAIRS COM 8.99 IDEA BANK MARKETING, SP PROJ7-19SHSP-PET GRANT 129.00 HASTINGS UTILITIES,UTILITIES 371.58 RON PUGHES,CELL PHONES 25.00 DAWNA WHITCOMB,CELL PHONES 25.00 G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS INC, SECURITY CONTRACTS BY OTH 3, 656.80 DEWITT FUNERAL & CREMATI,COUNTY BURIALS 626.12 STATE OF NEBRASKA, PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 111. 67 FIRST CONCORD BENEFITS GROUP,CAFETERIA PLAN ADMIN FEES 355.00 HR TOTAL SOLUTIONS,CONSULTING FEES 1, 600.00 MIDWEST CONNECT, POSTAL SERVICES 3,000.00 REGION 3 BEHAVIORAL HLTH SRVCS,MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES AC 6, 894.41 ROAD - BRIDGE FIVE POINTS BANK,HEALTH REIMBURESMENT ACCO 6,274.15 AUTO GLASS EXPERTS LLC,RD EQ REP PARTS 280.00 AUTO GLASS EXPERTS LLC,RD EQ REP LABOR 110.00 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS,RD EQ REP PARTS 158.56 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS, SUPPLIES - SHOP 11.04 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS,RD EQ REP PARTS 78.18 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS, SUPPLIES - SHOP 82.11 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS,OTHER EQUIPMENT REPAIR 15. 64 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS,BUILDING REPAIR 92. 61 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS,OTHER EQUIPMENT REPAIR 15. 64 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS, SUPPLIES - SHOP 8. 15 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS,MACH EQ GREASE OIL 19. 17 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS,OTHER EQUIPMENT REPAIR 15. 64 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS, SUPPLIES - SHOP 338.82 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS,OTHER EQUIPMENT REPAIR 15.64 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS, SUPPLIES - SHOP 17.58 AUTO VALUE - HASTINGS,RD EQ REP PARTS 102.13 BAUER BUILT,MACH EQ TIRES & REP 832.70 BGNE,EQUIPMENT - FUEL 594 .18 BIG G COMMERCIAL HARDWARE INC , SUPPLIES - SHOP 18.79 BIG G COMMERCIAL HARDWARE INC ,MISCELLANEOUS 99.97 CITY OF HASTINGS,WASTE DISPOSAL 85. 69 DEWEESE SAND & GRAVEL,MATERIALS - GRAVEL & BORR 22, 673. 94 FASTENAL COMPANY, SUPPLIES - SHOP 54. 10 EAKES OFFICE SOLUTIONS, SUPPLIES - OFFICE 7. 92 EAKES OFFICE SOLUTIONS, JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 146.08 FLEET PRIDE INC,RD EQ REP PARTS 1, 622.49 HATTEN ELECTRIC SERV & BAK VOL,OTHER EQUIPMENT REPAIR 112 .00 HOMETOWN LEASING,EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OFFICE 282. 60 ISLAND SUPPLY WELDING CO,WELDING SUPP/CHAINS 35.48 LANDMARK IMPLEMENT INC,RD EQ REP PARTS 191.41 LAWSON PRODUCTS, SUPPLIES - SHOP 228.03 LAWSON PRODUCTS,EXPRESS/FREIGHT 16.76 MCCONNELL CLEANING, JANITORIAL AGREEMENTS 260.00 NAPA AUTO PARTS, SUPPLIES - SHOP 6.28 NAPA AUTO PARTS,RD EQ REP PARTS 101.04 NAPA AUTO PARTS, SUPPLIES - SHOP 14.52 NAPA AUTO PARTS,RD EQ REP PARTS 75. 69 NAPA AUTO PARTS, SUPPLIES - SHOP 148.10 NAPA AUTO PARTS,RD EQ REP PARTS 3.38 NAPA AUTO PARTS, SMALL TOOLS, ETC. 65.09 NAPA AUTO PARTS,OTHER EQUIPMENT REPAIR 2 .88 NAPA AUTO PARTS, SMALL TOOLS, ETC. 25. 69 NMC EXCHANGE LLC,RD EQ REP PARTS 962. 63 NMC EXCHANGE LLC, SUPPLIES - SHOP 1, 920.41 OAK CREEK ENGINEERING,ENGINEERING 3, 527.78 PAVELKA TRUCK & TRLR REP,RD EQ REP PARTS 4, 198.42 PAVELKA TRUCK & TRLR REP,RD EQ REP LABOR 1,552.20 POWER PLAN,RD EQ REP PARTS 418.73 ROAD BLDG MACH & SUPPLY CO INC,OTHER RD EQ-WELDER/LOADER 4, 000.00 ROAD BLDG MACH & SUPPLY CO INC,EXPRESS/FREIGHT 730.15 ROAD BLDG MACH & SUPPLY CO INC,RD EQ REP PARTS 3, 441.36 ROAD BLDG MACH & SUPPLY CO INC,EXPRESS/FREIGHT 44. 16 TITAN MACHINERY INC. ,RD EQ REP PARTS 64.30 W G PAULEY LUMBER CO, FEMA GRANT COSTS 38. 96 W G PAULEY LUMBER CO,MATERIALS - LUMBER 493.01 WOODWARDS DISPOSAL SERVICE,GARBAGE 125.00 HEALTH FUND MIDWEST DESIGN IMPORTS,HEALTH-ACCIDENT - COUNTY 141. 99 JUVENILE SERVICES CARISSA L UHRMACHER, JUV GRANT COMMUNITY, 19-CB 44 .00 CASA,JUV GRANT ENHANCEMENT, 19- 2, 189.87 CASA, JUV GRANT COMMUNITY, 19-CB 1,714. 67 YWCA,JUV GRANT COMMUNITY, 19-CB 2, 843.00 REVIVE INC, JUV GRANT COMMUNITY, 19-CB 2, 135. 61 REVIVE INC, JUV GRANT ENHANCEMENT, 19- 892.13 AC & HWY 6 ROUNDABOUT NEBRASKA DEPT OF TRANSPORT,MISC ROAD CONTRACTS 500, 000.00 ESCROW HOLDING FUND GERHOLD CONCRETE COMPANY INC,MISCELLANEOUS 963.16 LCL TRUCK EQUIMENT INC,MISCELLANEOUS 1, 450.00 LYCOX ENTERPRISES,MISCELLANEOUS 18, 695.00 ROAD BLDG MACH & SUPPLY CO INC,MISCELLANEOUS 1,294. 11 Lee Hogan Board Chairman Ramona R.Thomas Adams County Clerk Exhibit A Submitted by: Elizabeth Lay Farm Credit Services of America RE: Isolated Land Hearing 8/4/2020 Collateral Analysis and Monitoring Summary Appraisal and Transaction Information Customer. Lay,Gregg Appraiser. Jenkins,Jadd R (386JL) Loan Amount 250K to 1M Total Acres: 153.04 TIN: Appraisal Request Date: 03/01/2012 CIF: 38675 Effective Value Date: 03/19/2012 Note: 201 Date Inspected: Application ID: 5113970 Office: Grand Island Financial Officer. Bachman,Michael E Market Value/Acre: $6,012 Valuation Basis: As Is Improvements Value: $0 Market Value: $920,000 Legal Description SW4 w/exception 9-5-10 (State: NEBRASKA County: ADAMS Lat 40.412154 Lona:-98.4523431 1.5 miles S and.5 miles W of Ayr 'Description 'Section(Township I TO I Rna I RD I Principal Meriden I Acres SW4(except out acreage on south side)Exact legal to be attached 9 5 N 10 W 6TH PRINCIPAL MRDN 153.04 to the appraisal by retail office. Requirements/Hypothetical Conditions and Extraordinary Assumptions Irrigation: The market value assumes that adequate water rights and all irrigation equipment are included in the rights appraised and are secured. • Specific Appraisal Requirements: • Secure irrigation equipment as described in comments located in subject property description of this report. • The well located on subject is registered under the name of Ronald D.and Evelyn M.Katzberg. Value in this analysis is subject to the name being changed on the well log at the NRD and State Department of Water Resources to reflect the name of the buyer of subject property based on information provided to the appraiser regarding the sale and included in this report. Environmental Concerns: SW4 w/exception 9-5-10:No Flood Hazard Determination Needed: SW4 w/exception 9-5-10:Yes Grain bins of no value are located in the SW4SW4. Overall Summary of Subject Production Value Information Collateral Class: 3 Net Income: $16,791 Capitalization Factor. 0.065 Production Value: $258,322 %DCL/MV: 22.00% Debt Coverage Loan: $206,657 Benchmark Relationship-Land Benchmark*: 554.0 %Benchmark Value: 75.73 FCSAMERICAtjenkinsj419 1 Farm Credit Services of America Summary Appraisal Report General Customer. Lay,Gregg Effective Value Date:03/192012 Appraiser. Jenkins,Jadci R Date Inspected: Client FCS America Level of Inspection:Desk Valuation Intended User. FCS America Appraisal Purpose: Estimating Current Market Value Intended Use: New Loan Appraisal Report Option as provided in Standard 2 of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice(USPAP):Summary Valuation Basis: As Is General Information SW4 w/exception 9-5-10 Rights Appraised: Fee Simple,Irrigation Equipment,Water Rights Improvements: Below Average Salability: Average Highest end Beat Use: Agricultural Marketing Time: 1 10 3 months Property Type: Ag-Irrigated Farm Exposure Time: 1 to 3 Months Property Value Trend: Increasing Sales Activity: Limited Size Unit Tract Value 153.04 Acres $6,012/Acre $920,000 Overall Summary of Subiect Total Acres:153.04 %Cropland:79.11 %Improvements:0.00 %Leased AU:0.00 Final Estimate Market Value Acres $/Acre Total Value As Is 153.04 $6,012 $920,000 Requirements/Hypothetical Conditions and Extraordinary Assumptions Irrigation: The market value assumes that adequate water rights and all irrigation equipment are included in the rights appraised and are secured. • Specific Appraisal Requirements: • Secure irrigation equipment as described in comments located in subject property description of this report. • The well located on subject is registered under the name of Ronald D.and Evelyn M.Katzberg. Value in this analysis is subject to the name being changed on the well log at the NRD and State Department of Water Resources to reflect the name of the buyer of subject property based on information provided to the appraiser regarding the sale and included in this report. • FCSAMERICA1jenkinsj419 2 Subject Property Information SW4 w/exception 9-5-10 (State:NEBRASKA County:ADAMS Lat:40.412154 Long:-98.452343) 1.5 miles S and.5 miles W of Ayr Legal Description 'Description iSectioni Township I TO I Rna I RD I Principal Meridian I Acres! SW4(except out acreage on south side)Exact legal to be attached 9 5 N 10 W 6TH PRINCIPAL MRDN 153.04 to the appraisal by retail office. Ownership History Current Owner. Seller Ownership Status: All of Tract being purchased now Ownership Status Prior to pending sale,subject property has been owned by Evelyn Katzberg and Beverly Johnson for at least the prior three years. Buyer Seller Sale Date Acres Price Term Method BonaFide Lay,Gregg Katzberg,Ronald D. 03/19/2012 153.04 $910,600 Cash Public Auction Yes and Evelyn M - Summary of inventories and allocation of values on an As Is basis. Dollar amounts are rounded. Market Zone:328 Land Type Acres] Unit' Rating Total $/Unit) $/Acre Inventory Total Recreational-Land 29.85 0.00 0.00 $0.00 $1,700 $50,731 Cropland-Sprinkler Irrigated-Average 92.65 SRPG 72.23 6,692.10 3114.19 $8,248 $764,145 Cropland-Dry Comers 28.42 SRPG 72.20 2,051.92 $5123 $3,699 $105.124 Roads&Waste 2.12 0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0 $0 Land Sub Totals 153.04 $6,011 $920,000 Tract Totals 153.04 Acres $6,012 Total Value:$920,000 FCSAMERICAijenkinsj419 3 FCSAMERICA1jenkinsj419 4 Scope of Work General: The Scope of Work decision by an appraiser relates to his/her judgment of information and the analysis required to correctly resolve the appraisal problem included in the assignment Scope of Work includes,but is not limited to,the following: • the extent to which the property is identified; • the extent to which tangible property is inspected; • the type and extent of data researched;and • the type and extent of analyses applied to arrive at opinions or conclusions. Several key assignment elements have been identified and examined to determine the scope of work for this assignment They include,but are not limited to the following which have been previously identified in this report • the client and any other intended users; • intended use of the appraiser's opinions and conclusions; • the type and definition of value; • the effective date of the appraiser's opinions and conclusions; • the subject of the assignment and its relevant characteristics;and • assignment conditions. Scope of Data Collection Relevant to the Subject Property: Information specific to the subject was obtained from one or more of the following sources that are reasonably believed to be reliable: • Owner,tenant,buyer or other knowledgeable party • Courthouse records • Government agencies including Farm Service Agency(FSA),state environmental and resource agencies, irrigation districts,county city planning and zoning departments,etc. • Geographical Information System(GIS)digital data and imagery including FSA field borders,field acres,soil maps,aerial imagery,topography maps Level of Inspection Completed: Jacki R.Jenkins,NE State General Certified Appraiser CG#940223,did a desk valuation on subject property,therefore did not complete a physical inspection. If the subject was not inspected,the extraordinary assumption is that there are no environmental or property risks other than those that are identified as a result of previous due diligence performed by FCSAmerica. Due diligence performed: • Verified Ownership History of Subject based on county records attached to this report and based on information provided by the retail office. • Verified Legal Descriptions,obtained necessary documentation and attached to addenda of this report. Requirement made for retail to attach a copy of the excepted site to this appraisal when obtained. • Mapped the property in GIS and generated soil maps and aerial photos that are in the addenda of the report. • Well Information was researched with one registered well(s)at the State Department of Water Resources. Well and/or water rights information is attached. • Subject property description was prepared based on all information attached to this report as well as information obtained from the buyer by the financial officer. No additional contact was made with customer as all information necessary for preparation of this report was provided at the time of the appraisal request. • Tax and/or assessor records are attached as verification of ownership,taxes and/or acres. • Purchase Agreement was not available at the time of this appraisal. • Sale is reported in Value Source,the FCSAmerica Database. Information from this sale is being utilized in this analysis. Scope of Information Collection,Confirmation,and Reporting: General: Sales and rents are collected,analyzed and verified on an ongoing basis by the Farm Credit Services of America Appraisal Team.Sources of information include inspections of sale properties,contacts with individuals knowledgeable of the local real estate markets,courthouse records,and multiple listing services(MLS). Cost information is obtained from Marshall& Swift Residential Cost Guide,Marshall&Swift/Marshall Valuation Service(agricultural and commercial buildings),or cost information obtained from local contractors and projects. General information about the subject's area and market can be found in the Value Source market zone descriptions. Type of Information: Data used to support the estimated value of subject property is considered to be the best available data in the market area for pivot irrigated cropland of similar quality to subject Market Area: Adams County,NE for the pivot irrigated and Adams,Nuckolls,Webster and Franklin Counties for the recreational land. Time period: November,2010 to present. Availability of Information: Data and Information used in the analysis has been summarized. Detailed information is retained in the appraisers work file,county sales files or in Farm Credit Services of America's computer sales database. Scope of Analysis and Reporting: This is a summary appraisal report as provided in Standard 2(b)of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice(USPAP.) The level of analysis completed is influenced by the"Intended Use and the"Intended User°of the appraisal as well as the FCSAMERICA\jenkinsj419 5 complexity of the assignment The scope of the appraisal process results in opinions and conclusions that are credible. Analysis Completed: COST APPROACH:The Cost Approach is a method of valuation where the current reproduction costs/replacement cost of improvements,less accrued depreciation,with the addition of the current market value of the land,may yield an indication of value.Depredation is attributable to physical,functional and economic influences observed in structures as they age.A summation of the residual value of the improvements and the current estimate of land is combined to establish a value. This approach will generally be eliminated if there are no improvements or minimal improvements on subject property. INCOME APPROACH: In applying the Income Approach to the subject property,the appraiser is measuring the present worth of the anticipated future benefits of property ownership.An investor purchases an income producing property for the benefit of receiving income that the property may produce.This income is analyzed and is based on current market data. From this income,operating expenses are fixed expenses that a typical investment property incurs for doing business or earning an income. The next step in the process is capitalizing this income into an indication of value based upon rates established from the market area. This process is referred to as Direct Capitalization where the income stream is capitalized into an indication of value based upon market derived information. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH:The Sales Comparison Approach utilizes sales of properties as a comparison to the subject.This procedure is referred to as the principle of substitution,where an informed buyer would not pay more for a property than the cost of acquiring a similar property.The process involves gathering sales data from the market and after confirming,reviewing and analyzing these sales,compare their attributes to the subject to arrive at an estimate of value. Another application of the sales comparison approach is the Gross Income Multiplier(GIM)which is a multiplier derived directly from comparable properties in comparison to the potential gross income of the comparable sale property. This multiplier is then directly applied to the potential gross income of the subject property. RECONCILIATION:The final step of the process is the Reconciliation or correlation of the indicators of value. During this process,each approach is reviewed for their strengths and weakness and a selection of value based upon the data analyzed is determined. Of the value established,this is influenced by the type of property,purpose of the appraisal and the reliability and adequacy of the data found within the report is weighed in the final decision. The sales and income approach adequately support the value of the subject property.Therefore,the cost approach was not completed.The omission of the cost approach does not affect the credibility of the report. Area and Four Forces of Value Analysis FCSAmerica Appraisers maintain market zones that represent geographic areas exhibiting similar overall market influences. A detailed analysis of the subject property's market area and four forces of value was completed and can be found in the Value Source market zone descriptions. The analysis is considered in arriving at the highest and best use of the subject property,but is not included in the report. The report is written for a client and intended user(s)who are knowledgeable about the market area,neighborhood,and specific agricultural industry. Farm Credit Services of America Benchmark Farms The FCSAmerica Appraisal team maintains data on benchmark farms located throughout Iowa,Nebraska,South Dakota and Wyoming. The benchmarks are used to document market trends for predominant land types found in these areas. Market values for the benchmark properties are established semi annually(January 1 and July 1)based on analysis of comparable sales.These benchmark farms are used as a basis for time adjustments which may be made in this appraisal. FCSAMERICA jenkinsj419 6 • Definition of Value Market Value:The most probable price which a property should bring in an open and competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale,the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably,and assuming the prices is not affected by undue stimulus.Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from buyer to seller under conditions whereby: • Buyer and seller are typically motivated; • Both parties are well informed or well advised,and acting in what they consider their best interests; • A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; • Payment is made in terms of cash in United States dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto;and • The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. (12 C.F.R.Part 34.42(g);55 Federal Register 34696,August 24,1990,as amended at 57 Federal Register 12202,April 9,1992;59 Federal Register 29499,June 7,1994) Source:The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal.Fourth Edition,published by the Appraisal Institute. Other Definitions Hypothetical Condition:that which is contrary to what exists but is supposed for the purpose of analysis. Hypothetical conditions assume conditions contrary to known facts about physical,legal,or economic characteristics of the subject property;or about conditions external to the property,such as market conditions or trends;or about the integrity of data used in the analysis. Extraordinary Assumption:an assumption directly related to a specific assignment which,if found to be false,could alter the appraiser's opinions or conclusions. Extraordinary assumptions presume as fact otherwise uncertain information about physical,legal,or economic characteristics of the subject property;or about conditions external to the property,such as market conditions or trends;or about the integrity of the data used on the analysis. Source:Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice.2008-2009 Edition,published by The Appraisal Foundation Exposure and Marketing Time Estimates Exposure time is the estimated length of time the property interest being appraised would have been offered in the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal. Exposure time is always presumed to precede the effective date of the appraisal. Marketing time is an estimate of the reasonable amount of time it might take to sell a real property interest at the concluded market value level during the period immediately after the effective date of the appraisal. An estimate of market time is not intended to be a prediction of the date of sale. It is inappropriate to assume that the value as of the effective date of the appraisal remains stable during a marketing period. Highest and Best Use Analysis Highest and Best Use is the premise upon which value is based. Highest and Best Use is defined as that reasonable and probable use that supports the highest present value,as defined, as of the effective date of the appraisal. The highest and best use is chosen from reasonably probable and legal alternative uses,found to be physically possible, appropriately supported,and financially feasible resulting in the highest value of the subject property. The definition applies specifically to the highest and best use of land.In cases where a site has existing improvements,the highest and best use may be determined from the existing use. The existing use of an improved subject will continue until the value of the land in its highest and best use,exceeds the value of the land and improvements. Subject's Highest and Best Use:Pivot Irrigated farm unit and recreational land. The subject is located in a rural area which is zoned for agricultural uses.The natural topography and productive soils allows for the subject to be used for any number of purposes,but the most financially feasible use is for pivot irrigated row crop production purposes due to the productivity of the soils and available water supply for the pivot irrigated and recreational land for those acres along the Little Blue River. Such use results in the maximally productive use as there are no altemative uses which result in higher return or value to the owner at this time. FCSAMERICAtjenkinsj419 7 SW4 w/exception 9-5-10 General Information Rights Appraised: Fee Simple,lnigation Equipment,Water Rights Hazards:Wetness Highest and Best Use: Agricultural Farming Ease: Average Non-Ag Influence: Recreational Water Supply:Private Land Quality:Above Average Flood Determination Needed:Yes Improvements: Below Average Salability Average Legal Access: Yes Location:Average Physical Access: Adequate Marketing Time: 1 to 3 Months Property Type: Ag-Irrigated Farm Exposure Time: 1 to 3 Months Size: 153.04 Acres Environmental Concerns: No Subject Compatibility:Average Sales Activity: Limited Property Value Trend:Increasing Road Type:Gravel Rights Appraised Irrigation equipment included is limited to wells,pumps,motors,gearheads and underground pipe. These items are considered part of the real estate and included in the land valuation. The pivot is not included in the value as it is owned by a third party. Flood Determination Needed Grain bins of no value are located in the SW4SW4. Property Description: Subject property is a pivot irrigated farm located just south of Ayr approximately 2 miles in Market Zone 328. Tract includes 153 assessed acres of which approximately 91 acres are pivot irrigated. Pivot presently on the tract is not owned by the buyer.Buyer will be putting up his own pivot which will reverse. Remaining cropland acres are classified as dry cropland corners. Parcel has one good capacity well that is registered to pump 1500 GPM. The acres running along the Little Blue River are categorized as recreational ground as that is the intended use of the buyer. Parcel includes three old grain bins considered fully depreciated. Site in SW portion of the farm includes 3 acres and is not included in this appraisal. Buyer/Seller Comments: Public auction sale that was well attended with active bidding. Improvements: Three grain bins considered of no contributory value. Land Description: Pivot irrigated soils include 67%Class I Hord,16%Class Ile and Ilw Anselmo and Cass soils,7%Class III Holder soils and 10%Class IV Holder soils. Overall soil quality is considered average to above average. FCSAMERICAyenkinsj419 8 Sales Approach Average SRPG:72.22 $99.44/SRPG Tillable:79.11% 153.04 Acres $601321/Aae Total Value:$920,262 The Sales Comparison Approach to Value represents quantitative and/or qualitative comparisons between the subject property and the individual comparable properties.The comparable properties preferably will be closed sales,but can also include listed properties,and properties under contract(written purchase contracts with substantial down payment).This approach is most reliable when market activity and sales are plentiful.The reliability of this approach is reduced when the number of comparable sales in the market is limited. Typical elements of comparison include,but are not limited to:property rights conveyed;financing terms;sale conditions (Buyer and Seller motivation);sale date;physical features and condition of the subject's land and improvements(if any) including location, size,type,utility,quality,and condition;economic characteristics,zoning,and non-realty value components. Sales have been analyzed using a bracketing method. Comparable sales used in the sales comparison approach represent properties that have similar characteristics and highest best use as the subject property.This method provides a range of values of land and improvement inventories based on actual sales. Terms Adiustments: The market data in this approach is adjusted to cash equivalent basis. Any terms adjustments are based on market research and analysis. Market Trends: Time adjustments(if made)are based on market trends supported by sales of similar properties or Farm Credit Services of America Benchmark farms.Sales utilized in this analysis are not time adjusted as the irrigated sales have taken place within the past 5 months and there is limited data available to support a time adjustment for the pasture/recreational land. Market Activity and Conditions: Market in this area has been fairly active with some pockets indicating somewhat strong values. Overall,market in the area has been up as compared to the market one year ago. A summary of key sales data used in this appraisal is included in the addenda.The detailed sales are in the Farm Credit Services of America database or the appraisers work file. Market Zone:328 Land Type Acres Unit Ralingl Total $/Unit $Low/Acre $High/Aae $/Acre Inventory Total Recreational-Land 29.85 0.00 0.00 $0.00 $1,300 $1,700 $1,700 350,745 Cropland-Sprinkler Irrigated-Average 92.65 SRPG 72.23 6,692.10 $114.22 $6,060 $12,775 $8,250 S764,363 Cropland-Dry Comers 28.42 SRPG 72.20 2,051.92 55125 $3,680 $7,400 $3,700 $105,154 Roads&Waste 2.12 0.00 0.00 $0.00 50 $0 $0 S0 Land Sub Totals 153.04 I $6,013 $920,262 Recreational-Land Subject property recreational ground is assigned an estimated value at the top end of the range indicated for recreational land in the area. The range is based on recreational land and on good quality pasture due to lack of activity in the area of any recreational sales other than sale of subject and Sale#6 in Franklin county. The pasture sales included indicate a value range of$1,235/acre-$2,086/acre,with four of the six sales reflecting a sale price range of$1,600-$1,700/acre. Generally recreational ground in this and most areas sells at the upper end of pasture market range or higher. Sale of subject indicates a sale price of$1,700/acre which is the top end of the pasture range. Value estimated is based on$1,700/acre. Cropland-Sprinkler Irrigated-Average Subject property pivot irrigated cropland is assigned an estimated value toward the lower end of the range indicated by seven sales that have taken place within 18 miles of subject since November 1,2011. Sales were all public auctions. In analyzing the sales data,the following was noted: Sales#1,2,and 3 were tracts that sold at the same auction to a very large investor for all time market high prices. These were all full pivot quarters. Sale#4 was an auction that sold to an adjoining land owner. Verification indications location played a big factor in what buyers were willing to pay. Sales#16 and#22 took place in November,2011. One could conclude with the auction sale activity after the first of the year,the market has trended upward. However,these two sales are either located further west in a weaker market area of Adams county or are in an area where water has been a concern in the past To conclude the market has gone up that substantially based on three sales at one auction by a large investor did not see rationale for this area,therefore no time adjustment was made. Sale#5 is the sale of subject property and is considered the best indicator of value in this analysis. It was a public auction as well,of a parcel that does not include a full circle pivot and is located along the Little Blue River and areas can be susceptible to wetness. Soil quality is good with a large percentage of Class I soils. Based on the data included in this appraisal of recent activity,sale of subject is given the most emphasis in estimating an overall value for subject's pivot irrigated cropland. FCSAMERICANenkinsj419 9 Cropland-Dry Corners Sales in this market zone indicate that dry cropland corners sell for approximately 45%of the irrigated inventory. This is the basis for the value estimated for these acres. Income Approach VALUATION METHOD INDICATED VALUE VALUE PER UNIT Direct Capitalization Method: $932,800 $6,095.14 The Income Capitalization Approach to Value considers the potential net operating income generated by the property under typical management The income is converted to an estimated value using capitalization or discount rates derived from the analysis of comparable sales.This approach estimates value by dividing the subject's net income by the capitalization rate, which is extracted from sales. Basis of Income: This approach is based upon typical rental terms for the area as supported by actual rental data in my files.Typical rental rates for the subject property's inventories are$200-$260/acre for pivot irrigated,$60-$120/acre for dry cropland and$35- $40/acre for above average pasture. Rents for the pivot acres are based on typical less a$25 adjustment since the pivot is not included in the value. Basis of Expenses: Expenses paid by the landlord vary. Generally,the landlord pays all real estate taxes,insurance on buildings,and major maintenance items for the improvements. The landlord pays some production costs with a crop share agreement. The sales and the subject were analyzed using typical expenses for the area. The basis for rental data and capitalization rates is included in the comparable sales data files;cash rent database,and/or other information in the appraiser's files. Cap Rates: Capitalization rates of most of the comparable sales range from 1.6%to 2.9%with an average of 2.0%. On the basis of these sales a cap rate of 1.8%is used which is the cap rate indicated by sale of subject property and considered the better comparable in this analysis. Direct Capitalization Method Inventory Type *Units Units I *Units Units S/Unit%Landlord Variable Inventory Total Income Expense Cropland,Sprinkler In. 92.65 Acres 1.00 Year $205.00 100.00 $813 $18,993 Cropland,Dryland 28.42 Acres 1.00 Year $95.00 100.00 $0 $2,700 Pasture/Acre 29.85 Acres 1.00 Year $35.00 100.00 S0 $1,045 Real Estate Taxes: $5,134 Maintenance Expense: $0 Land&Building Insurance: $0 Management Expense: $0 Landlord Variable Expense: $813 SUMMARY OF DIRECT CAPITALIZATION METHOD Total Gross Landlord Income: $22,738 Total Landlord Expense: $5,947 Expense Ratio: 26.15% Net Rent Income: $16,791 Cap Rate: 1.80% Market Value: $932,800 $/Acre: $6,095.14 FCSAMERICAyenkinsj419 10 Reconciliation The valuation process involves reconciling the value indicated from the approaches used into a final value of value range. The reconciliation considers the reliability of each approach based upon: -Quality and Accuracy of the Data -Quantifry of Data -Appraiser Judgement and Experience The following is a summary of the reliability of each approach used in this appraisal and the basis for the estimated market value. Valuation Approach Total Indicated Value Value Per Unit Sales Approach $920,300 $6,013.46 Income Approach $932,800 $6,095.14 Final Market Value $920,000 $6,011.50/Acres Cost Approach: N/A as subject has no improvements of value. Sales Approach: The sales approach is a reliable indicator of value when there are adequate recent comparable sales that have similar land and building inventories that are located in a similar market area. Income Approach: The indicated value can change significantly with a small change in the capitalization rate or other variables,resulting in a less reliable approach. Unimproved properties require fewer assumptions and can provide good support so generally the more improvements a property has the less reliable the indicated value. Conclusion: The sales approach to value offers fairly good support of the market value for subject property. Sales utilized are all recent market exposed transactions including pending sale of subject property which was an auction.The income approach offers fairly good support of the sales approach with current rental rates reflected in the most recent sales and a narrow cap rate range. In this analysis,emphasis is given to the sales approach in estimating an overall value due to the fact that the best comparable data available is the pending sale of subject property. FCSAMERICAIjenkinsj419 11 Assumptions,Contingent and Limiting Conditions This appraisal is exclusively for the use stated as of the value date identified in the report. The appraisal is not valid for any other use. Value conclusions are based on comparable property sales within a similar area over an appropriate time;and the appraiser's general knowledge of the market in the area. The sales included in the report represent comparable sales for this property. This appraisal is subject to the following assumptions and contingent and limiting conditions. • Intended User/Intended Use:This appraisal is for use only by the client for the intended use stated in the report. Use of this report by others is not intended or authorized by the appraiser. There may be third parties eligible to receive a copy of the appraisal report due to disclosure requirements. Such third parties have not been identified to the appraiser as intended user,and they have not been considered as intended users by the appraiser. The appraisal report,in whole or in part,may not be disseminated to the public. • The title to the subject property is assumed to be owned fee simple,unless indicated otherwise in the"Rights Appraised'section. Any existing liens or encumbrances are disregarded. No independent search of public records was conducted. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for issues affecting the property appraised or the title thereto. The appraiser does not render any opinion as to the title of the property. • The"As Is"market value,if estimated in this appraisal,is the estimated market value as of the value date. • The"As Completed'market value,if estimated in this appraisal,is a hypothetical value as of the value date. In other words,the estimated market value assumes that all improvements set out in the property description have been completed. The"as completed"market value is not a prospective value as provided. • The property is appraised based on the legal description furnished. A formal survey of the subject property was not conducted. Acreages and sketches in the appraisal are based on information obtained from reliable sources. Plats are intended to assist in visualizing the property. They are not to an accurate scale. Furnishings,equipment, personal property,trade fixtures,and business operations,except as noted are disregarded. Only the real estate and building(s)are considered in the report. • Values allocated to the various portions of the subject property are their contributory values to the total property and should not be used separately in conjunction with any other properties. The contributory value of a portion may not be the value of the portion if severed from the total property. All values and costs are effective the date of the appraisal. The value estimated and the costs and other estimates used in arriving at the appraised value are as of the date of the appraisal. Because the markets upon which these estimates and conclusions are based are dynamic in nature,the appraisal is subject to change over time. Furthermore,the appraisal is subject to change if future physical,legal,financial and other conditions differ from conditions on the date of the appraisal. • Unless otherwise stated in the report,the value is based on surface rights and does not include mineral,gas,oil or similar rights that may exist in whole or in part. There are assumed to be no hidden or latent conditions of the property,subsoil,or building(s),which would render the property more or less valuable. • Farm Credit Services of America employees are not required to give testimony or attendance in court,by reason of this appraisal,with reference to this property or information contained within or used as the basis for value. • The appraisal is based on the premise that there is full compliance with all applicable federal,state,and local statutes and regulations. This appraisal is subject to the confidential review for ethics and standards compliance by state regulatory authorities. • Farm Credit Services of America and its appraisers are not experts regarding matters arising under,or subject to, the provisions of environmental laws such as CERCLA,RCRA,Clean Air Acts,Clean Water Acts,or other environmental laws,including state and federal laws,arising there under or similar thereto. Accordingly,this appraisal does not include an opinion on the presence,absence or effect of any hazardous or toxic materials,toxic waste,or any other substance contamination of buildings,improvements,air,water,plants,or soil. Farm Credit Services of America accepts no responsibility to discover or report any hazardous waste or contamination and the appraised value does not include any adjustment for risk,expenses or costs,if any,which at any time result from or are associated with the damage by,or removal,or storage of,any items specified,or similar to those specified,in this paragraph. FCSAMERICAyenkinsj419 12 Appraisal Certification I certify that,to the best of my knowledge and belief • The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. • The reported analyses,opinions,and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions,and are my personal,impartial,and unbiased professional analyses,opinions,and conclusions. • I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and I have no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. • I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. • I have not provided any services regarding the subject property within 3 years of the date of this appraisal as an appraiser or in any other capacity. • My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. • My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client,the amount of the value opinion,the attainment of a stipulated result,or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. • My analyses,opinions,and conclusions were developed,and this report has been prepared,in conformity with Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. • No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to me. • This appraisal is comprised of the report and all attached addenda. • This appraisal is not based on a requested minimum valuation or specific valuation or approval of a loan. I have NOT made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. On the basis of elements that could affect the value of the subject property,I have concluded a value of $920,000 Appraiser Signature: +/ ' /- A ✓ ' 't Jade R Jenkins Nebraska-State General Certified Appraiser Number. CG940223 Date of Report 03/19/2012 Farm Credit Services of America Appraisal Department FCSAMERICAlenkinsj419 13 Addenda FCSAMERICAyenkinsj419 14 Irrigation SW4 w/exception 9-5-10 Well Acres Located On Property Registered Registration# Water Quantity Water Quality Wen.Pump&Motor Included 160.00 Yes Yes G-000785 Average Average Yes FCSAMERICAIjenkinsj419 15 :�Farm Credit Services of America Aerial Map i, Everything you nerd to grow. 5-5ft-10W° 4-5t4 t,, „ ,, � H t N) / /./ ' 71 r. /// 1 3-5t1-1011.1 xjr i 5r:-10vJ 1t? N 1 t}aN 1.Tac,61srpg, t, . ' 7 ''''''''41 � . 29.9ac �, 1 . c,7asmg * ` 1 `_ 92.7ac,72srpg ' Q fY I i1 4Vt 49 775 Z ac;76s rpg rP9 1 e , s_, . 0 1, • "- 17-6N-1 O , 15-5th T 6;f1Y ti" * 15-5N-1011 h s Horizontal Map Scale: 1 Inch = 1,393 Feet Legend -, 0 States EJ Counties CLU ,0s'� Soils ED Townships Sections 1 . Cropland - Sprinkler E3 Recreational - Land 17 Irrigated - Average Cropland - Dry Corners Date: March 19, 2012 **.Farm Credit Services of America Soil Report ,,. Everything you need to grow. ' 3755 .° , . ,' 836 =� iAl +" M84 35 8808 "% �,I _. , � ../ 7 8436 < r88 bc 1. / 8436 •i 7 -f 9-5, -1�:'7 i I y 3. 2 r= '1dr_ '2gam .. ,r, 4114 8436 6869 t 1 t _ w "' Scale: 1 Inch = 2,042 Feet t/ :,...-V ' 3755 3755 2869 -8436 2,869 ik7:, 174 4:. ./ 16-5N-10W [ ,,,r Land Record #1 - Cropland - Dry Corners Symbol Color Soil Description Class Class % of p Dry Irr Acres Area SRPG 3755 Hord silt loam, rarely flooded I I 16.1 56.6 76 8436 Cass loam, occasionally flooded IIw IIw 7.4 26.0 61 8869 Hord silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes IIc I 4.8 16.9 77 3710 Cass fine sandy loam, rarely flooded IIe IIe 0.1 0.5 62 Total Acres: 28.4 Weighted Average: 72 Land Record #2 - Cropland - Sprinkler Irrigated - Average Symbol Color Soil Description Class Class Acres % of SRPG Dry Irr Area 8869 Hord silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes IIc I 62.0 67.0 77 4114 Holder silty clay loam, 7 to 11 percent slopes, severely eroded IVe IVe 9.4 10.2 66 8808 Anselmo fine sandy loam, terrace, 0 to 1 IIe IIe 8.8 9.5 52 percent slopes Date: March 19, 2012 Symbol Color Soil Description Class Class Acres °/O °f SRPG Dry Irr Area 8436 Cass loam, occasionally flooded IIw IIw 6.2 6.7 61 3883 Holder silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes, eroded IIIe IIIe 6.1 6.6 74 Total Acres: 92.7 Weighted Average: 72 Land Record #3 - Recreational - Land Symbol Color Soil Description Class Class Acres % of Dry Irr Area 8436 Cass loam, occasionally flooded IIw IIw 19.1 57.2 0 9999 Water 6.9 20.5 0 8869 Hord silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes IIc I 4.3 12.8 0 3755 Hord silt loam, rarely flooded I I 3.2 9.5 0 3710 Cass fine sandy loam, rarely flooded IIe IIe 0.0 0.0 0 Total Acres: 33.4 Weighted Average: 0 Date: March 19, 2012 Wells Search Results Page 1 of 1 Return to Search Page Nebraska Department of Natural Resources Database Through: 3/16/2012 Processed: 3/19/2012 2:20:08 PM REGISTERED GROUNDWATER WELLS DATA RETRIEVAL Note: Information on Public Water Supply Wells is not available through this interface.Contact the Department of Natural Resources(Data Bank)at 402 -471-2363 for more information.All registration documentation for water wells registered after January 1,1997,except Public Water Supply wells, are now available. Due to possibility of a well being in more than one series,an individual well might be listed more than once. 1 Records found. Registration# Use County Name Completion Date Acres Irrig Pump Col Dia Owner's Name Well ID Status NRD Name Filing Date Gallons/Min Pump Depth and Address Permit Number Well Location Decommissoin Date Static Level Well Depth Owner ID Footage Times Replaced Pumping Level Well Log Latitude Series Longitude G-000785 I Adams 6/20/1956 160 — Ronald D&Evelyn M Katzberg Co Trustees Wel1ID:4130 A Little Blue 7/5/1956 1500 gpm -- OwneriD: 15505 5N IOW 9 SESW -- -- 2525 North Roseland Avenue Other Info Loss Map It -- Juniata,NE 68955 View as PDF PRO Data copy of requested wells. Data copy of Geo Lous for requested wells. Data copy of Casino Screen for requested wells. Data copy of Grout Gravel for requested wells. Legend and Notes http://dnrdata.dnr.ne.gov/wellscs/Results.aspx?where=TGFzdE5hb WUgb... 03/19/2012 DNR Lat/Long Results Page 1 of 1 Processed by State of Nebraska Department of Natural Resources Data(Bank)3/19/2012 2:20:36 PM Subsection: SESW Section:9 Township: 5 Range: l0W Footage: 659 feet from the South section line and 1982 feet from the West section line. Latitude: 40°24' 36.68" Longitude: -98°27'05.91" C-0835'Y• t Pk r?.. crr Fd ii TRogi'&40. ellt4.-tKij . Iw a _ 1 -093:.7 14 : 1 I 'z B UJ fii WItyvL '*_:� J© C'14 Ili p - k _ _ L l Legend Zooming-3 options o Double click on Map to zoom in o Plus(+)and minus(-)signs in upper left corner of map also zoom in and out.Hover with mouse over area and when pointer disappears,click. Plus is on top and minus is below it. o Click on map and use mouse wheel to zoom in or out. Panning—Moving around map Click on map and hold,drag mouse direction to move map DISCLAIMER The well location computations are based on calculated section corners,and not surveyed information or GPS coordinates.Therefore,ALWAYS check with the water well owner for the land description(including Footage, Quarter/Quarter, Section,Township,Range and County)of the property where the well is located.This computed well location information is for checking purposes only. http://dnrdata.dnr.ne.gov/Geo2LegalCalc/Calculate.aspx?Latitude=40.410... 03/19/2012 • • M �o� o00 o i-r...." 0 r co to W a co a ot 03 NN"3 T2 V C N ir re IYNN CO cla C S am C W .'ai is 0 J: m J > 2 I- 0 zV Co 0 0) O U) N co v co a m NO 7 ~�� o Q Jo e) N ;1« y3 Q. 533 c m M Q . C 40 U c) 0 O c O H 0 Q m D N u) co O x: W a. = I-CNN V N > 0 w J zz z z U Gtr.), jp .a.. Q Q W to J a. .141 a C 00 m ~ a LLcc ) z a (0 y a o a03 a >- O 7 C F p Z tr NZz m v O NiO 0 1° a Z Q' N rn N .6. in� �. ; Q. N m in U) E 3 N :9re co▪ >- 0 m Q 0 X CO O W at to co to U Z O. y a I— M p' d gin Q tx mco VC C m Z I• ym 0 CD 01 U til ctG V Y Cl) m a c >c d v 4 ICU U m fQ O U a Q m a c > a J O coQ d Z m M J Y co co o co GNN m p 2 m d o N N N c W 40 d L To r+ d • 7 T 00 Z 0 } TL 1- 4 Co 6 m 0 W CO o Z O O _ „ W _ Og 0 a O , co 0 en Ill 1 a CCZQ W 43) U' 0 O Q iy W g; OUN I— ''''cm cn Q w 0 00ix cm co Q rCe� a3 U t0 p `' m W O. N CO a N 0 / `. a N 0 d` eo > p o W, Z Q� 0' X 4" J x . 0 o a } oa, ., W a ' R wn c a. J n w g v a v le- w to to te bH O a Lat .fio tocLL ` = > > 9 cc W , c ). « mO a , I- C7 .; oW• ] p _ ? mp aa Ni ma = paw a cc . 0�-pCax tmp at1 •� i O h Q o co > O 0- l6 V x .. p a+ 0 p co co o)u? Y�cw? az U -i N Z r CO W a F- = a J a a a od>1-- M 0) 0) O )- N N Y C W cccn0 co a L 0 V a 011F Z Z a c.)0 om.) N Lo 0 z co N J N .1 o N 0 J ao m -a- 00o n N M o — Q N M m O V WCC 10 1:1 0 c t7 a 3 p U O tit 0 CZQ (..) J 4 CO a' F. a Z 00 a Ill N tu Q a o -o mY n A. 0 ;o w m w E W m •g W E r U o H 0 tW- 0 0 = S Li O N M — 6. W O O m w to z N x a g Q F- _ 0 0 y N Z O E r° 0 0 Cl) o ct 0 z z IC d • m > -c..E I a0 0 re U)-I N a o o 0 — W 0 WZQ 41 > W <_ ! 0 0 0 _i 'O O `F -.I Q V Z Z > Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 4 0 m>- y t° n 61 F in Or M M 0` 0 .6 [1- 000 « : ¢. 7E N 0 n t. CO U -14 C d Q, —« u) CO D t0 CO 0) M f0 00 Z CO ›.- .5 C n V O Cr' 000 ON V 0 Q a' U)= 0) 0 LL M 00 c0 co 0 0 R W 0 CO O)Y) 0 0 0 R) R) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 2 _Z Z Z a 0 o M v N N M O tO O Ea 0) m u CO R) O M N N- 0 r f 0) 0) a Z_ z_ Z < Q Q Q_ Ce 12e Ce O 0 0 0 U) J J J CO - W W W 0 W W W .... o w CO � N W O 0 G a z z z C 00) 0) 0) Toa 0 0 0 0 , = W g to u! 0 0 (9 0 0 0 CO - 0 0 0 0 0 Q Fes- w 0 < ce re ce K ce ce ce 0 W W W 0> kcri\ )§ ) a \ ) a CI 2 Q � @ a U) W C }k RI © 1 - O _ en is- § as 1 ; « & ; ; # ! ; ■ _E | \ £ #& #k � ' « « a < *) ) ) ko , 0 gS { ) a e ) k \< \ @f t ; E 55E ■ f - - % @f « ; t ■ y ; « 3 ■ f « ! k § y § § 2 . # r &; \ ] 2222 « Ekla « r &§ / / &§ aJr& § a < r &§ ; 1aPa S aP0 = rmpa aP 5 5aP0 E aPR ` 2mws ` 5 R ■ , .i : ; « ! § ! qa - cinn , 2 ® 2 ; e5a ] ' S5 2a ! `• 6 » - - » , ,- � � � , Ca a E in" r {/� 2 Zi a !{� ) _ § _ 8 {{) g 7k 0Z ` ) \ $ \ \ f % f ) = � 72 ) k / $ ! ■ \ § S. ) 2 / ` D_ ! ) a <0 < 2 <k 5 <o < S ¥a , 2 \3f2 <a a g � § r \ 0$§ (; 2k § \m § 2 § \� 2COm ; § ; ] % ) \ » 01 .0; ; 01/ G | c ;• § k 7 asZ ( Z � k\ = Z_ � �` � o- "X . 0 o\) }§ / 2 - ® � � ; ) k `ou_ .- , - # ° kdS < R < ■ - e0 ) §� } JG0F� (C2; z . z ., 2 § § \ §; _ o = Y ; . . ZIo .Qoa, Of ( = 2 } lj2 • m2 §V- \§ I 0 0 \ CO CO RI CD 0\17.3 di�� O i §LL Q ■ cc $ ¥f E g, ! § d ni 5 <05 fK ; % ! ■ & 4 < E 22 ; aMm « � , = r §7a "" ar • | ® - /S.{.; ! > _ E {ƒfk — 17:- a- ) \ / Faro .. \ _ , _ le 2 N U0 m / § , ; \ ( ■ 0.1 cei cts tcs P" I0LU 0 /09 kl, � 2 > > Z 0;§ § _ $ ! }= Gulling z4S}§ • N2 O a N m O CO 7t. 0 el d (7 Co 0 O O N d' 8 8 8 • m a6 ✓ n a a e e e e - o m n �o a U 8 " 22�p H m O N H O 199 141m O A N Cl) 0 Vre � 0 0 1A 0 O O S m 1.4\Y V NN O Hm M O n m N M 91 sr sr. N e- y N H N wW N N NJ Q reE 0 LL ppm B el 10 h A O 00 0 a0t8 m 8 e N O 0 O e. eNi m '9 N w N 404H Q Q 9 H a E m e > E o o` E E a E 0 E E m e E E E E E e 'e c x > > c g i E 8 s 2 Q G a u E _ 4N 3 NyN c co W 3 N N � o O N O o CD m G7 f0 N2 o..--a_ N N a .-c7 M O el N CO 0 r 0 0. N Ce 73 CO CD L Q. N ... y m a N0o m . o o a .; tl U ' tl tl 2 g < < , z . < , < . ` < a < a ¢ a a a k Q a a a < ¢ < a 5 u Q < a C CU r goo °- � ogc» oso. 0oo. w ••-°. o „ omcem 600CC < J 0 o O 6 y b o o 01 m N O m N m 0 t0 to a 'O m vi cn m N ^ w M 9 V �+l O o O Si O m r ? M 0 O t0 N N v W V m O os 0 w p Qi y w w w tl w mw w(° w`° w.o wn wn L e c CO UU LL 15, E"aa aua < o ba Eap oa E au oa ma ooaEo oa a u oa < ¢ cr ¢ ¢ < ctQa ¢ b ¢ go ¢a < Q ¢ < cc oQ ooo0.dooaooao a0, oo4 040o8 660 °- Zii agw w oQ00.- N ¢ a oo 0¢ MONodON6t2 oonNeoNN g O g O n 1 o n co ! Om ' O m m m � n :2"; H < Cd n ii. co m � p ' n N w w a m p ii; ww W to w w 0 0 0z 2' ` o - m <7 ; ; I: tl < g tl = 0 ''''7 ; v = a $ ug o rQ o f o v o o • 0< aaa a ..a ¢ Ea - ,EQ »▪ aEw " ,, E » " as P. P. E. . oro7m , v . m m Soomoo ?-• m O0 m , , m0 ng napa . 0 ,-- e0 w .- N4w ". < N _ ow 0 w O YI w o n n tl on ono - c - 0o co E ^ n .-- /. , w o. w w 4) m n m o ra � r f, E > R ?iE t € g _ € — E m € — A — € S a tl E m LL a LL m` g- m` LL LL m �y m` 2" ZF o = 9 0 o m = -a - 9 ' tl m m m o ' al aa`E < Epp Hoo< Qz ¢ w ¢E ¢ w ¢@¢ w ¢EE ¢< w <- < a :n o .€ e 44 13 tl c Q n a� e e o c .. Ce o.f c' a * m e )0 a' a n m m m v W n m N U c7 o r N m 45 o 0, < I n o < Z n . en co vi 0. n n n . o 2 m N N a 0v in m 7 a m 7 v 0n Co 7 < en W 7 < O N ..! 2 o 0 U 0 N_ J J J 0) U M Z Z m O EN 01 yr Q w Ytl ' N 1- 03 4. OO o O O 4 i O N Naas 4' N p 2 m rN 26 QN O `Q OgQ N2 '�zN V .i O N 7 0 CI N y p .:aov co 0�, ¢p 'a . o O E N o O m O n O 0 0 — co o p CO �M CI 0 0 0 CS tl T m - Q , N N , Q tl N.- m G m - ¢ a co_ ¢ o^ O Q a 6 - J.Q aD q W W tl - W 0i W tl W mW 0 7 w n Z o na H Z o o w w W m to U U 2 >i a y Z m —w Z O `o N H Z 0 0 '3 59 2 0 O 1.4 (NIM §� §\ 0 61 01 C) k J 01 et 00 & co m 0 et 3 13 . . . � § .2 § 2 11• 01 0 CI CD el co. ! 04 ei m ,.m sr ® _01 CI ■$fj _ k; } 3{ , # ■ i# § § i!• t & .! J | ! | » ! ! g ! ! ! §k — ! k ! - ! 8 l ; 't8 } f) 2 CCD- ! ! k ! f cm cp t \ 1...1 To >